25 Mar

Commons talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

‎Content added while evading a block or ban: c
← Older revision
Revision as of 16:18, 25 March 2013
Line 1,056:
Line 1,056:

''—[[User:LX|LX]] ([[User_talk:LX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/LX|contribs]])'' 15:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

''—[[User:LX|LX]] ([[User_talk:LX|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/LX|contribs]])'' 15:45, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

:If I understand you correctly, the IMO only practically relevant question is whether DRs filed by an IP which is likely associated to a banned/blocked user, should be tolerated. Of course, such DRs may be retaliatory, which makes them a problem for the targetted user. As far as I remember from the PK case, there was no general consensus. --[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|talk]]) 16:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

:If I understand you correctly, the IMO only practically relevant question is whether DRs filed by an IP which is likely associated to a banned/blocked user, should be tolerated. Of course, such DRs may be retaliatory, which makes them a problem for the targetted user. As far as I remember from the PK case, there was no general consensus. --[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|talk]]) 16:05, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
−
:{{o}} I believe the intention here is to delete all uploads from sock accounts, rather than IPs. We have plenty of precedence for this ''not'' happening, as there have been several sock accounts blocked in the last year where there were significant numbers of uploads made. These were judged on their own merits as to whether they were in scope for the project and correctly met the licensing policy. We do not need to have knee-jerk reactions and encourage yet more sock hunters. Frankly, I don't care much about people having legitimate alternative accounts, and as many as they fancy, so long as all their accounts comply with policy, do not corrupt discussions intended to create a community consensus - for example by voting several times in one DR, are not used to harass other users and are not used to evade blocks, bans or other community or office conditions. Uploading can be used disruptively, but mass deletions of in-scope content should not be encouraged. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 16:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:{{o}} I believe the intention here is to delete all uploads from sock accounts, rather than IPs. We have plenty of precedence for this ''not'' happening, as there have been several sock accounts blocked in the last year where there were significant numbers of uploads made. These were judged on their own merits as to whether they were in scope for the project and correctly met the licensing policy. We do not need to have knee-jerk reactions and encourage yet more sock hunters (some of our contributors seem only here for the LOLz of sock-hunting; it can become disruptive in its own right). Frankly, I don't care much about people having legitimate alternative accounts, and as many as they fancy, so long as all their accounts comply with policy, do not corrupt discussions intended to create a community consensus - for example by voting several times in one DR, are not used to harass other users and are not used to evade blocks, bans or other community or office conditions. Uploading can be used disruptively, but mass deletions of in-scope content should not be encouraged. --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 16:16, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion&diff=93258849&oldid=93258740