20 Mar

User talk:Tuvalkin

‎Footpaths vs. railways: repl.
← Older revision
Revision as of 01:54, 20 March 2013
Line 603:
Line 603:

::Well, I think that [[:Category:Icons for footpath descriptions]] (and also [[:Category:Icons for railway descriptions]]) should be what their names imply — and include things like [[:File:Fußweg P7090247.JPG]] or [[:File:Fareskilt 25.PNG]] (aptly in neatly named subcategories, of course), for that’s how Commons’ categories usually work. There should be "See also:" links to [[:Category:BSicon]], too, at all those generic categories about rout diagrams, mapping signs, etc. But that’s not going to be a swift, simple change. Fornow, I suggest that we keep [[:Category:Icons for railway descriptions]] “clean”, as a future [[:Category:BSicon]], and '''ignore''' [[:Category:Icons for footpath descriptions]] and [[:Category:Icons for canal descriptions]] (which are currently incomplete mirror repositories for set_f and set_g). (Also: Congratulations for your hard work renaming and fixing the usage of so many icons!) -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 15:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

::Well, I think that [[:Category:Icons for footpath descriptions]] (and also [[:Category:Icons for railway descriptions]]) should be what their names imply — and include things like [[:File:Fußweg P7090247.JPG]] or [[:File:Fareskilt 25.PNG]] (aptly in neatly named subcategories, of course), for that’s how Commons’ categories usually work. There should be "See also:" links to [[:Category:BSicon]], too, at all those generic categories about rout diagrams, mapping signs, etc. But that’s not going to be a swift, simple change. Fornow, I suggest that we keep [[:Category:Icons for railway descriptions]] “clean”, as a future [[:Category:BSicon]], and '''ignore''' [[:Category:Icons for footpath descriptions]] and [[:Category:Icons for canal descriptions]] (which are currently incomplete mirror repositories for set_f and set_g). (Also: Congratulations for your hard work renaming and fixing the usage of so many icons!) -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 15:16, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

:::{Thanks; I also got [[uk:Обговорення користувача:YLSS|sgushenka]] for that! [[User:YLSS|YLSS]] ([[User talk:YLSS|talk]]) 17:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC))

:::{Thanks; I also got [[uk:Обговорення користувача:YLSS|sgushenka]] for that! [[User:YLSS|YLSS]] ([[User talk:YLSS|talk]]) 17:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC))

+
::::Vkusniĭ!! -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 01:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

:::If you move the aforementioned icons to "set f", please consider creating some subcat. Having 100+ icons on one page is quite confusing. [[User:YLSS|YLSS]] ([[User talk:YLSS|talk]]) 23:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

:::If you move the aforementioned icons to "set f", please consider creating some subcat. Having 100+ icons on one page is quite confusing. [[User:YLSS|YLSS]] ([[User talk:YLSS|talk]]) 23:25, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

+
::::Yes, sure. If anything, I’m usually to blame for the opposite — creating categories with too few items in them (which later fill up, as expected), especially those under [[:Category:Trams in Lisbon]]. -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 01:54, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tuvalkin&diff=92914355&oldid=92913404