16 Mar

User talk:Tomascastelazo

‎Closed DRs
← Older revision
Revision as of 02:56, 16 March 2013
Line 844:
Line 844:

I challenge you, Ecemaml, to prove to the public opinion that I am what you say I am. Of course you cowardly move while I am blocked, as it is common with your type, for you cannot face an open debate with real arguments and with honesty and integrity. You move in the safety of my silence, while in the wiki-gulag I am in. Be a man and debate, don´t hide behind the skirts of cowards. Come out in public. That´s where the debate belongs, in the eyes of all. But of course, you and your type decide to block me because you cannot dispute the truthfulness of what I bring to this forum in the open. And yes, like you did with one of my comments, go and tell on me on the administrator´s board, like the squealer that you are. Yes, that is my opinion of people like you. How can coward, corrupt and abusive people be respected? For them, there is nothing but contempt.

I challenge you, Ecemaml, to prove to the public opinion that I am what you say I am. Of course you cowardly move while I am blocked, as it is common with your type, for you cannot face an open debate with real arguments and with honesty and integrity. You move in the safety of my silence, while in the wiki-gulag I am in. Be a man and debate, don´t hide behind the skirts of cowards. Come out in public. That´s where the debate belongs, in the eyes of all. But of course, you and your type decide to block me because you cannot dispute the truthfulness of what I bring to this forum in the open. And yes, like you did with one of my comments, go and tell on me on the administrator´s board, like the squealer that you are. Yes, that is my opinion of people like you. How can coward, corrupt and abusive people be respected? For them, there is nothing but contempt.

+

+
And I challenge administrators to act within the spirit of their charge and apply the rules with integrity and honesty regardless of who the nominator and uphold due process as stated in policy. The time policy is set so the public, not just the administratores, to study the case and give an opinion. The DRs were closed on the whim of an administrator and thus depriving the community of its say. There is absolutely no reason to bypass policy, because if we allow anyone to do it, the whole thing comes apart, eventually. That is the reason for policy, to hold together the system. And this system is a collaborative system, not the real of policy violators.

+

+
I don´t know what is more disruptive, being an outspoken and contributing collaborator or a policy violating admistrator.

This is a clear case of abusive, irresponsible and unchecked administrative power and privileges.

This is a clear case of abusive, irresponsible and unchecked administrative power and privileges.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Tomascastelazo&diff=92656067&oldid=92655762