02 Apr

User talk:Steve Morgan

‎Category:Parks in Portland, Oregon: reply
← Older revision
Revision as of 04:50, 2 April 2013
Line 104:
Line 104:

You removed the 'urban parks in the U.S.' category from some of the Portland parks categories, but the 'urban parks' category does not include the 'Parks in Portland' parent category. Did you intend to add the 'urban parks' category to the parent 'Parks in Portland, Oregon' category? --[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]] ([[User talk:Another Believer|talk]]) 15:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

You removed the 'urban parks in the U.S.' category from some of the Portland parks categories, but the 'urban parks' category does not include the 'Parks in Portland' parent category. Did you intend to add the 'urban parks' category to the parent 'Parks in Portland, Oregon' category? --[[User:Another Believer|Another Believer]] ([[User talk:Another Believer|talk]]) 15:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

+
:No, because the 'urban parks in the U.S.' category includes the category [[:Category:Parks in the United States by city|category "Urban parks in the United States '''by city'''"]], and the 'Parks in Portland' category ''is'' included there, as are all similar categories for other individual U.S. cities. That's why the 'urban parks in the U.S.' category has relatively few entries and why, until I made this change, Portland entries accounted for about ''half'' of them, which was a clue to me that something was amiss. I had to fix St. Louis the same way, but all of the other cats for "parks in .... [a specific U.S. city]" were correctly omitted from this cat as they were already placed in the "by city" subcat. The "by city" cat has also been mentioned as a "see also" at the top of the broader cat you mentioned. [[User:Steve Morgan|Steve Morgan]] ([[User talk:Steve Morgan#top|talk]]) 04:50, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Steve_Morgan&diff=93812744&oldid=93756550