30 Mar

User talk:Senator2029

‎Look at it and close the deletion request
← Older revision
Revision as of 10:04, 30 March 2013
Line 156:
Line 156:

::Animula, I certainly welcome your artistic contributions, but not your sarcasm. We all try to do our best here, let's keep that in mind. Now in reply to what you wrote, things aren't as bad as you think they are. You responded to deletion discussion and provided the links. That's good! An administrator will see that as evidence that you are indeed the author, whether I leave a message or not. But since you have brought it to my attention, I am willing to do so. I apologize for the inconvenience to you. [[User:Senator2029|Senator2029]] 13:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

::Animula, I certainly welcome your artistic contributions, but not your sarcasm. We all try to do our best here, let's keep that in mind. Now in reply to what you wrote, things aren't as bad as you think they are. You responded to deletion discussion and provided the links. That's good! An administrator will see that as evidence that you are indeed the author, whether I leave a message or not. But since you have brought it to my attention, I am willing to do so. I apologize for the inconvenience to you. [[User:Senator2029|Senator2029]] 13:35, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+

+
:::Senator2029, You find at the moment it easy to seem calmed and ready to discuss. Yet, as I was able to mean it in the bistro ([[there|https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bistro#Suppression_contribution_-_d.C3.A9saccord]] and [[there|https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Bistro#Test_de_paternit.C3.A9_pour_image_-_Outil_internet_non_commercial]]), it is your methods which I incriminate and not the principles in the name of which you act.

+
You showed disrespect and impoliteness by using the term " obviously " without bringing the inherent proofs for such a word, and plainly refused to answer me when I asked you by which means it would have been possible to me to prove my good faith.

+
I shall have had to write you here so that you deign to answer me " That's You responded to deletion discussion and provided the links. good! The year administrator will see that have evidence that you indeed the author are, to whether I leave has golden message not. " Unfortunately, Two days previously, your deletion request had been invalidated. And a confirmed user such as you was not able to you to ignore it. This to say that I am not a dupe of your benevolence shown late and to ask you to be more respectful in the future when you will make deletion requests. Cordialement [[User:Animula|Animula]] ([[User talk:Animula|talk]]) 10:04, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

==Image deletion, redux==

==Image deletion, redux==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Senator2029&diff=93590484&oldid=93501668