17 Mar

User talk:Rodhullandemu

Categories - photos
← Older revision
Revision as of 20:13, 17 March 2013
Line 145:
Line 145:

:: Streets in (district) sounds good. As it is it is far too random (don't you agree?). [[User:Babydoll0409|Babydoll0409]] ([[User talk:Babydoll0409|talk]]) 16:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

:: Streets in (district) sounds good. As it is it is far too random (don't you agree?). [[User:Babydoll0409|Babydoll0409]] ([[User talk:Babydoll0409|talk]]) 16:18, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

:::It would benefit from some subdivision, yes. It's moot whether we should do this now, but if we do, we will be setting up for those to come after us. [[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]] ([[User talk:Rodhullandemu#top|talk]]) 16:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

:::It would benefit from some subdivision, yes. It's moot whether we should do this now, but if we do, we will be setting up for those to come after us. [[User:Rodhullandemu|Rodhullandemu]] ([[User talk:Rodhullandemu#top|talk]]) 16:20, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
==Categories - photos==

+
Someone has done a great job in arranging the main categories, sub-categories, sub-sub-categories etc. in Dumfries and Galloway. Would it be possible to display the main categories with the indented sub-categories under them so that when one is sorting photos they can see into which sub-category to add them, knowing they will automatically go up to the main category ? At present only the main categories are displayed (i.e. in Dumfries and Galloway) and it means double the work-time if people only sorted photos into these displayed main categories and then someone having to re-sort them into the non-displayed sub-categories etc.. Thank you.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rodhullandemu&diff=92776228&oldid=92628349