21 Mar

User talk:Pi.1415926535

‎Silverliner category: Denver
← Older revision
Revision as of 01:34, 21 March 2013
Line 46:
Line 46:

:Yeah, that makes sense, though unless it happens I'll keep the neatened combined category. I feel it's unlikely that we'll see them sold off, though; SEPTA's MUs are designed to deal with both the ex-PRR and ex-Reading catenary. Metro-North won't touch them because they don't have third rail shoes, NJT has shiny new equipment, and MARC run loco-hauled only. In any case, I think it's reasonable to keep the combined category until/unless anyone else acquires some. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535#top|talk]]) 04:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

:Yeah, that makes sense, though unless it happens I'll keep the neatened combined category. I feel it's unlikely that we'll see them sold off, though; SEPTA's MUs are designed to deal with both the ex-PRR and ex-Reading catenary. Metro-North won't touch them because they don't have third rail shoes, NJT has shiny new equipment, and MARC run loco-hauled only. In any case, I think it's reasonable to keep the combined category until/unless anyone else acquires some. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535#top|talk]]) 04:26, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
::In case you're still watching: I just found out that the [[:en:East Corridor (RTD)|East Corridor]] project will use EMUs based on the Silverliner V design. I'm waiting to see actual production cars (at least a few months to years down the line) before I call the category one way or the other since the local name may be different. [[User:Pi.1415926535|Pi.1415926535]] ([[User talk:Pi.1415926535#top|talk]]) 01:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pi.1415926535&diff=92983538&oldid=92260555