User talk:Martin H.

‎editions war and reverts
← Older revision
Revision as of 14:08, 29 March 2013
Line 2,404:
Line 2,404:
 

 

 
He wants that his changes on the file are those shown in the wikipedia article at all costs (and acknowledged it explicitly). He has uploaded several versions of the same image that have been deleted for being smallness file versions to March 11. I invite you to compare the quality of the file uploaded by me (March 11) and the uploaded by the user (that is the actual).
 
He wants that his changes on the file are those shown in the wikipedia article at all costs (and acknowledged it explicitly). He has uploaded several versions of the same image that have been deleted for being smallness file versions to March 11. I invite you to compare the quality of the file uploaded by me (March 11) and the uploaded by the user (that is the actual).
 
+

 
+
Realizing that his miniatures versions were deleted, began to untie the edit war at the file.
 

 

 
The user says that do not know very well the rules of the community, but he shows no interest for reads nor accepts advices.
 
The user says that do not know very well the rules of the community, but he shows no interest for reads nor accepts advices.
Line 2,434:
Line 2,436:
 
::If a user contributions destroy the quality of a file must be reversed, for example just for spite altering the RGB and HSL levels that resulting in the reddening of the image tone. These contributions are unnecessary because they are not needed and cause damage
 
::If a user contributions destroy the quality of a file must be reversed, for example just for spite altering the RGB and HSL levels that resulting in the reddening of the image tone. These contributions are unnecessary because they are not needed and cause damage
 
::Clearly, the user does not understand or respect the impartiality of contributions. Obviously he opposes that any user improve his contributions when be necessary.
 
::Clearly, the user does not understand or respect the impartiality of contributions. Obviously he opposes that any user improve his contributions when be necessary.
−
::Mistakenly he call "oppose an version" to the improvements that any user can make to a contribution made by him. He does not accept that anyone to contribute to the contributions made by him (this violates exceedingly one of the most essential and basic rules of our community). Note again that the user wants that his changes on the file are those shown in the wikipedia article at all costs
+
::Mistakenly he call "oppose an version" to the improvements that any user can make to a contribution made by him. He does not accept that anyone to contribute to the contributions made by him (this violates exceedingly one of the most essential and basic rules of our community). Note again that the user wants that his changes on the file are those shown in the wikipedia article at all costs.
 
::I already spoke with he before referring the case to you, and as you can see the user is very stubborn and he not pay attention to the suggestions and wants to impose its will over all. Therefore I was obliged to take the case before a administrador.
 
::I already spoke with he before referring the case to you, and as you can see the user is very stubborn and he not pay attention to the suggestions and wants to impose its will over all. Therefore I was obliged to take the case before a administrador.
 
::I have my tranquil conscience, you're a excellent administrator and I trust that your contribution will the best for the good of our beloved community. --[[User:Coronades03|G. Coronades]] | [[User_talk:Coronades03|Do you have a question?]] 03:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::I have my tranquil conscience, you're a excellent administrator and I trust that your contribution will the best for the good of our beloved community. --[[User:Coronades03|G. Coronades]] | [[User_talk:Coronades03|Do you have a question?]] 03:28, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Martin_H.&diff=93531741&oldid=93531339