User talk:Look2See1

‎Yet another warning - & for no reason ?: COM:AN/U
← Older revision
Revision as of 03:24, 1 April 2013
Line 860:
Line 860:
 
:::Look2See1, I don't want to get involved in this issue, as I have not had the opportunity to review any of Nyttend or your points in any detail. However, I did want to raise the specific bullet point issue. You should not assume that what is an "obvious" readability issue to you is so obvious to everyone else. It's very subjective. If someone raises it as a concern, you should restrain from implementing the "bullet point style" elsewhere unless you want to raise the issue in a more general forum. Personally, I am a fan of bullet points, but I do think regular prose can be more appropriate in many circumstances. I find bullet points can often be less than helpful where we have, or may have, image or category descriptions in multiple languages. I checked one (only one!) instance of where you and Nyttend were disputing the use of bullet points and I tend to agree with Nyttend on that one -- but I do not want to make too big deal of it because it was only one example, your other additions to the image description in that case were very good, and I really want to focus on process here more than the minutiae of one photo description. I know your views may be different than mine, and that's fine. But I do think, since Nyttend has raised this issue and how subjective these layout and style issues are, that if you feel strongly about implementing additional "bullet point style" descriptions elsewhere on any kind of regular basis, that you should first canvass opinion on the Village Pump. Just my opinion. I hope that helps. --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 21:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 
:::Look2See1, I don't want to get involved in this issue, as I have not had the opportunity to review any of Nyttend or your points in any detail. However, I did want to raise the specific bullet point issue. You should not assume that what is an "obvious" readability issue to you is so obvious to everyone else. It's very subjective. If someone raises it as a concern, you should restrain from implementing the "bullet point style" elsewhere unless you want to raise the issue in a more general forum. Personally, I am a fan of bullet points, but I do think regular prose can be more appropriate in many circumstances. I find bullet points can often be less than helpful where we have, or may have, image or category descriptions in multiple languages. I checked one (only one!) instance of where you and Nyttend were disputing the use of bullet points and I tend to agree with Nyttend on that one -- but I do not want to make too big deal of it because it was only one example, your other additions to the image description in that case were very good, and I really want to focus on process here more than the minutiae of one photo description. I know your views may be different than mine, and that's fine. But I do think, since Nyttend has raised this issue and how subjective these layout and style issues are, that if you feel strongly about implementing additional "bullet point style" descriptions elsewhere on any kind of regular basis, that you should first canvass opinion on the Village Pump. Just my opinion. I hope that helps. --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 21:08, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 
::::I agree with Nyttend on the points raised above. I've been seeing your changes to images I watch for over a year now. Most of your changes are non-standard. I have no problem with you adding a link to English Wikipedia, but all of the reformatting with bullets, bold text, and etc is not an improvement. I also have no problem with adding a well thought out category, but you seem to continue to all but ignore [[COM:OVERCAT]] and to add strange, non-standard formatting to the sort keys. You need to stop and consider what people are telling you, something I haven't seen evidence of. You just keep on trucking doing the same things and believing you're the one who is "correct.". If you refuse to take any of this into consideration, you're probably headed toward not being able to edit at all. [[User:Altairisfar|Altairisfar]]_{[[User talk:Altairisfar|talk]]} 22:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 
::::I agree with Nyttend on the points raised above. I've been seeing your changes to images I watch for over a year now. Most of your changes are non-standard. I have no problem with you adding a link to English Wikipedia, but all of the reformatting with bullets, bold text, and etc is not an improvement. I also have no problem with adding a well thought out category, but you seem to continue to all but ignore [[COM:OVERCAT]] and to add strange, non-standard formatting to the sort keys. You need to stop and consider what people are telling you, something I haven't seen evidence of. You just keep on trucking doing the same things and believing you're the one who is "correct.". If you refuse to take any of this into consideration, you're probably headed toward not being able to edit at all. [[User:Altairisfar|Altairisfar]]_{[[User talk:Altairisfar|talk]]} 22:01, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 
+

 
+

 
+
==COM:AN/U==
 
+
{{autotranslate|base=Discussion-notice|1=COM:AN/U|2=|3=}}
 
+
[[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 03:24, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Look2See1&diff=93719394&oldid=90610932