User talk:INeverCry
A funny edit...
← Older revision
Revision as of 01:35, 2 April 2013
Line 50:
Line 50:
:not a good job of cheating, as it only tries to grab bad admins in the web, the nominator may be adding a deletion discussion for other reasons than just wanting it deleted, such as adding it for someone else when they are in fact neutral on the matter. Also, people like me would add a DR on something that should be deleted and then vote keep, simply because I can see the difference between my own opinion and my computation of the community opinion and do what is good for the majority whilst at the same time opposing them. If someone is purely vote counting contrary to the purpose of the DR, well good luck to em, it's not how it is meant to be done. One vk is not double voting imho. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 09:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
:not a good job of cheating, as it only tries to grab bad admins in the web, the nominator may be adding a deletion discussion for other reasons than just wanting it deleted, such as adding it for someone else when they are in fact neutral on the matter. Also, people like me would add a DR on something that should be deleted and then vote keep, simply because I can see the difference between my own opinion and my computation of the community opinion and do what is good for the majority whilst at the same time opposing them. If someone is purely vote counting contrary to the purpose of the DR, well good luck to em, it's not how it is meant to be done. One vk is not double voting imho. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 09:22, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
+
+
+
==Alexander Ipatov Photo==
+
Hi. Would you please tell me why the Alexander Ipatov photo was deleted? It was published on Flickr under the 2.0 license, and that is what I chose when I uploaded it. So I do not understand how there could be a copyright violation. Please explain.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:INeverCry&diff=93799166&oldid=93775331