User talk:Fastily

‎File:Herbicide_Stockpile_Kadena_AFB.png
← Older revision
Revision as of 12:47, 20 March 2013
Line 23:
Line 23:
 
::::No one is above the rules or special. Are we having an opinion contest? If so, It's beyond me what makes you think you're ''so'' special that you are high and mighty and are never wrong. I am new to wikipedia and uploading media and still learning not out to break all the rules and pretend I am special. You have a bad attitude in my opinion is that you should back off and give people the benefit of doubt when you don't know or aren't sure. You complained that you couldn't find the file online or confirm it. Because it is not online. Go bitch to the US gov who has hidden this file since 1971 from investigators. The numbers across the side of the new file are Court Case numbers and is how I got it. If it did not go to court we would not have it. The issue is that you thought a picture that I helped create of US government generated text violated the copyright of someone else. For that I question your wisdom. It was asked and I explained the situation that it is the original work of US gov and the photo was restored and then you went back and deleted it again for some other reason. I had assumed the issue was resolved. In short, you are wasting my time, your time, king of hearts time and the [[COM:OTRS]] with poor judgement. Enforce the rules in a way that is not a waste of time for everyone else. The issue could have easily been resolved by not deleting it after it had been already restored- why make a federal case out of it by deletion if it's not a clear violation and a "simple and easy to remedy" fix. You also seem to get a lot of messages like this one. You had the source info from the previous deletion and I did not see the message that it had an issue until it was gone-either time. Now you have enough information to restore it so do so. I also mentioned the critical urgency of the restoration as this file in reference to an international press event. You should at least have taken this into account when you deleteted it. Again, super poor judgement.[[User:Johnvr4|Johnvr4]] ([[User talk:Johnvr4|talk]]) 17:32, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::::No one is above the rules or special. Are we having an opinion contest? If so, It's beyond me what makes you think you're ''so'' special that you are high and mighty and are never wrong. I am new to wikipedia and uploading media and still learning not out to break all the rules and pretend I am special. You have a bad attitude in my opinion is that you should back off and give people the benefit of doubt when you don't know or aren't sure. You complained that you couldn't find the file online or confirm it. Because it is not online. Go bitch to the US gov who has hidden this file since 1971 from investigators. The numbers across the side of the new file are Court Case numbers and is how I got it. If it did not go to court we would not have it. The issue is that you thought a picture that I helped create of US government generated text violated the copyright of someone else. For that I question your wisdom. It was asked and I explained the situation that it is the original work of US gov and the photo was restored and then you went back and deleted it again for some other reason. I had assumed the issue was resolved. In short, you are wasting my time, your time, king of hearts time and the [[COM:OTRS]] with poor judgement. Enforce the rules in a way that is not a waste of time for everyone else. The issue could have easily been resolved by not deleting it after it had been already restored- why make a federal case out of it by deletion if it's not a clear violation and a "simple and easy to remedy" fix. You also seem to get a lot of messages like this one. You had the source info from the previous deletion and I did not see the message that it had an issue until it was gone-either time. Now you have enough information to restore it so do so. I also mentioned the critical urgency of the restoration as this file in reference to an international press event. You should at least have taken this into account when you deleteted it. Again, super poor judgement.[[User:Johnvr4|Johnvr4]] ([[User talk:Johnvr4|talk]]) 17:32, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::That pretty much did nothing but prove my point [https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/1942867215/image.jpg exactly]. If you be trying to diss me, you ain't doin too dank of a job. Have a good day, [[User:Fastily|FASTILY]] [[User talk:Fastily|^(TALK)]] 08:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::That pretty much did nothing but prove my point [https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/1942867215/image.jpg exactly]. If you be trying to diss me, you ain't doin too dank of a job. Have a good day, [[User:Fastily|FASTILY]] [[User talk:Fastily|^(TALK)]] 08:56, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
−
:::::not trying to did you. You are doing a great job- at being an ass.[[User:Johnvr4|Johnvr4]] ([[User talk:Johnvr4|talk]]) 12:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:::::Not trying to dis you other than you don't know dank. You are doing a great job- at being an ass. It is a work of US GOV and there is no copyright. You should know that if you are a admin- good or bad and you should have taken the news event under consideration before acting for the at least the second time. I'm inexperienced and you have poor judgement. That is not a dis. It is a fact. [[User:Johnvr4|Johnvr4]] ([[User talk:Johnvr4|talk]]) 12:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 

 

 
== [[File:GADDUM.svg]] ==
 
== [[File:GADDUM.svg]] ==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Fastily&diff=92936080&oldid=92935915