27 Mar

User talk:Ecemaml

← Older revision
Revision as of 13:36, 27 March 2013
Line 138:
Line 138:

Your closure comments of the images I nominated for deletion about my behaviour are completely out of line and could be interpreted as offensive and personal attacks. I made the deletion nominations according to policy and with legitimate reasons, so much that you deleted the images because they either violated policy or were of dubious origin. Please comment on the merits of each particular case and do not assign motivies to my actions, especially if your comments reflect negatively on a legitimate issue. If anything, given your status as an administrator and one who actively nominates images for deletion due to copyright violations, I was very surprised that you uploaded so many images without the proper documentation. While looking at your recent massive image upload I found many images that I cannot find an educational value nor practiical use, however, I did not want to nominate them for deletion, but instead call on you to evaluate carefully the images that you uploaded and reflect on the real usefuleness of them within the scoope of the project.

Your closure comments of the images I nominated for deletion about my behaviour are completely out of line and could be interpreted as offensive and personal attacks. I made the deletion nominations according to policy and with legitimate reasons, so much that you deleted the images because they either violated policy or were of dubious origin. Please comment on the merits of each particular case and do not assign motivies to my actions, especially if your comments reflect negatively on a legitimate issue. If anything, given your status as an administrator and one who actively nominates images for deletion due to copyright violations, I was very surprised that you uploaded so many images without the proper documentation. While looking at your recent massive image upload I found many images that I cannot find an educational value nor practiical use, however, I did not want to nominate them for deletion, but instead call on you to evaluate carefully the images that you uploaded and reflect on the real usefuleness of them within the scoope of the project.

Regards, --[[User:Tomascastelazo|Tomascastelazo]] ([[User talk:Tomascastelazo|talk]]) 15:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Regards, --[[User:Tomascastelazo|Tomascastelazo]] ([[User talk:Tomascastelazo|talk]]) 15:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
==Fotos de mural interior==

+
Una duda que tenemos en la Galipedia. Si en el interior de un edificio hay un mural o pintura de un autor que aún conserva sus derechos de autor, ¿se puede subir a Commons?, ¿y si se tiene permiso del párroco, o responsable del edificio, para hacer fotos? ¿O habría que tener el permiso del autor? Mira estos dos ejemplos: [http://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Templo_Palacios_30.jpg uno] (obra de Antonio Palacios que murió en 1945) y [http://gl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ficheiro:Fresco_na_Capela_Santo_Ant%C3%B3n.JPG dos] (obra de ¿Felix Sesto? firmada en 1982). Saludos, --[[User:Elisardojm|Elisardojm]] ([[User talk:Elisardojm|talk]]) 13:36, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ecemaml&diff=93372301&oldid=93256236