15 Mar

User:Andrew Gray/feedback

+
← Older revision
Revision as of 13:43, 15 March 2013
Line 32:
Line 32:

#:*AFT should not be enabled without a contributor willing to handle the feedback for that collection (this contributor may be an existing Commons user, or an institutional representative).

#:*AFT should not be enabled without a contributor willing to handle the feedback for that collection (this contributor may be an existing Commons user, or an institutional representative).

#:*AFT can be disabled if there is no activity in handling comments after a reasonable period of time.

#:*AFT can be disabled if there is no activity in handling comments after a reasonable period of time.
−
#We work out a suitable method for wording the feedback request form.
+
#We work out a suitable method for wording the feedback request form and titling the system.
−
#We find a better name than "article" feedback!

==Questions==

==Questions==
Line 42:
Line 42:

#'''Won't we get a lot of useless comments?'''

#'''Won't we get a lot of useless comments?'''

#:On Wikipedia, an awful lot of the comments were useless - they were personal opinions about the subject of the article, irrelevant, or simply vandalism. However, the different focus on Commons - on the file, rather than on the broad topic - should hopefully mean we're less likely to get personal opinions about the subject.

#:On Wikipedia, an awful lot of the comments were useless - they were personal opinions about the subject of the article, irrelevant, or simply vandalism. However, the different focus on Commons - on the file, rather than on the broad topic - should hopefully mean we're less likely to get personal opinions about the subject.

+
#'''But these aren't articles!'''

+
#:The Commons version can be given a different name - "image feedback" or "media feedback", for example.

==Comments==

==Comments==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Andrew_Gray/feedback&diff=92622029&oldid=92618368