Talk:BSicon/Renaming

‎Former ABZ3: typo and correction
← Older revision
Revision as of 23:50, 2 April 2013
Line 1,009:
Line 1,009:
 
::::: To name it exactly: ''Prefixes'' always describe the state (u,e,x,m,f), the form (b,c,d,v) or the kind (h,t) of an icon, ''suffixes'' always describe the direction (a,e,g,q,l,r,1,2,3,4) or the level (o,u) of the track!
 
::::: To name it exactly: ''Prefixes'' always describe the state (u,e,x,m,f), the form (b,c,d,v) or the kind (h,t) of an icon, ''suffixes'' always describe the direction (a,e,g,q,l,r,1,2,3,4) or the level (o,u) of the track!
 
::::: So if you and Useddenim decided to find another meaning for the "q"-suffix, it's not my problem. I created hundreds of BSicons following this old consense that has been written down on several pages on different projects. And to parrot myself ''your'' use of the "q"-suffix has never been documentated anywhere! [[User:Axpde|'''a'''×'''p'''_de]][[User Talk:Axpde|^Hello!]] 11:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::::: So if you and Useddenim decided to find another meaning for the "q"-suffix, it's not my problem. I created hundreds of BSicons following this old consense that has been written down on several pages on different projects. And to parrot myself ''your'' use of the "q"-suffix has never been documentated anywhere! [[User:Axpde|'''a'''×'''p'''_de]][[User Talk:Axpde|^Hello!]] 11:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
−
:::::: You’re so full of yourself you don’t even understand that I and Useddenim have antagonic ideas about how to use "q". As for «documentation», let me repeat that what you so popously refer to as such are mostly obsolete instructions that has been superceded by later decisions found in discussion such as this. My idea of "q" (not really only mine, as it is shared with Circeus, for one) is not «documented» because it is a proposal — it should be widely accepted before it is added to those instructions pages (if they ever get updated): But of course a suggestion for discussion is something you cannot wrap your head around. You only agree to explain the reasons behind your actions when everybody is is really pissed off, as it is the case now. Actually Axpde, you can harp about how much me or others are «new» to BSicons and how you clobbered out the very first {{BS-q|STR}} with a silex hatchet, but it is easy to gauge how much work each of us has put in the project and frankly there’s only one thing for which your stand from the BSicon crowd… -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 15:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
+
:::::: You’re so full of yourself you don’t even understand that I and Useddenim have antagonicdifferent ideas about how to use "q". As for «documentation», let me repeat that what you so pompously refer to as such are mostly obsolete instructions that has been superceded by later decisions found in discussion such as this. My idea of "q" (not really only mine, as it is shared with Circeus, for one) is not «documented» because it is a proposal — it should be widely accepted before it is added to those instructions pages (if they ever get updated): But of course a suggestion for discussion is something you cannot wrap your head around. You only agree to explain the reasons behind your actions when everybody is is really pissed off, as it is the case now. Actually Axpde, you can harp about how much me or others are «new» to BSicons and how you clobbered out the very first {{BS-q|STR}} with a silex hatchet, but it is easy to gauge how much work each of us has put in the project and frankly there’s only one thing for which your stand from the BSicon crowd… -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 15:05, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::: And for what it's worth, my definition of "q" usage ''is'' documented ([[:en:Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms#Suffix|here]], for example) because a) it does not conflict with your original definition, and b) is a subset of Tuvalkin/Circeus’ proposal. [[User:Useddenim|Useddenim]] ([[User talk:Useddenim|talk]]) 21:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 
::::::: And for what it's worth, my definition of "q" usage ''is'' documented ([[:en:Wikipedia:Route diagram template/Catalog of pictograms#Suffix|here]], for example) because a) it does not conflict with your original definition, and b) is a subset of Tuvalkin/Circeus’ proposal. [[User:Useddenim|Useddenim]] ([[User talk:Useddenim|talk]]) 21:41, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
 

 

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BSicon/Renaming&diff=93866032&oldid=93865617