29 Mar

Talk:BSicon/Colors

‎HexRGB value vs. generic name
← Older revision
Revision as of 05:55, 29 March 2013
Line 109:
Line 109:

:I agree that all simple color names should be used (as not using any isn’t a practical option). Indeed, the name "green", as soon as it made free by renaming and recategorization of set "f", will be used for 2DBE2C. The name "red" was free and fits EF161E as well or better than any other — of course BE2D2C is our main color, but it doesn’t need a name (set "") and it is also an atypical shade of red. (Other replies ''q.v.''.) -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 23:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

:I agree that all simple color names should be used (as not using any isn’t a practical option). Indeed, the name "green", as soon as it made free by renaming and recategorization of set "f", will be used for 2DBE2C. The name "red" was free and fits EF161E as well or better than any other — of course BE2D2C is our main color, but it doesn’t need a name (set "") and it is also an atypical shade of red. (Other replies ''q.v.''.) -- [[User:Tuvalkin|Tuválkin]] [[User talk:Tuvalkin|✉]] 23:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
::Ah, alright. I was under the vague impression (I'm following this discussion only from afar) "green" wouldn't be used, hence my slight confusion. [[User:Circeus|Circeus]] ([[User talk:Circeus|talk]]) 05:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:BSicon/Colors&diff=93497403&oldid=93495397