21 Mar

Commons:Village pump/Proposals

‎Higher standards for "porn" images: 2 questions
← Older revision
Revision as of 23:51, 21 March 2013
Line 80:
Line 80:

:If you want to try a real and current case, see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gheent these uploads], in several of which the depicted person is identifiable per face. --[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|talk]]) 22:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

:If you want to try a real and current case, see [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Gheent these uploads], in several of which the depicted person is identifiable per face. --[[User:Túrelio|Túrelio]] ([[User talk:Túrelio|talk]]) 22:34, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

::Yeah I nuked those. COM:PEOPLE issues just too glaring; sue me. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|talk]]) 23:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

::Yeah I nuked those. COM:PEOPLE issues just too glaring; sue me. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ([[User talk:Rd232|talk]]) 23:22, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
: (1) What exactly is a "porn image"? Anything with nudity? Anything displaying sex acts? Confined to human activity or not (e.g. is an image of dogs engaged in intercourse "porn"?

+
: (2) Re: "Don't allow porn images with the sole source of 'own work', ever." So, once we could agree what is "porn", are you saying that if a regular contributor with a broad variety of work takes such an image, we wouldn't accept it? - [[User:Jmabel|Jmabel]] ! [[User talk:Jmabel|talk]] 23:51, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Proposals&diff=93053130&oldid=93052987