Commons:Village pump/Copyright

← Older revision
Revision as of 12:17, 16 March 2013
Line 329:
Line 329:
 
thank you Closeapple for your comment. I sent permissions-commons@wikimedia.org copy of the note sent by the editor of the newspaper giving permission for use on the First time in the USA.jpg, but did not receive any tkt number from them. I put a note on the article but it was still deleted by Fastily...do not know why?? the rest of the work is my own so do not know why the flaggin? {{unsigned|Sharky60|09:42, 16 March 2013‎}}
 
thank you Closeapple for your comment. I sent permissions-commons@wikimedia.org copy of the note sent by the editor of the newspaper giving permission for use on the First time in the USA.jpg, but did not receive any tkt number from them. I put a note on the article but it was still deleted by Fastily...do not know why?? the rest of the work is my own so do not know why the flaggin? {{unsigned|Sharky60|09:42, 16 March 2013‎}}
 
:The reason that files like this get deleted so quickly is that Commons gets a lot of uploads from confused users that scan or photograph or crop someone else's copyrighted work and then claim "own work" based on having scanned or photographed or changed it. You happen to be the rare exception: From what you have said, you have scanned what is really your own original work, after it has been passed through another medium. An OTRS ticket should hold off the wolves at the door until a real decision is made: Once you have sent e-mail with the filenames you are uploading, put [[Template:OP|{{subst:OP}}]] somewhere in the information text on that file. Hopefully that will give fair warning not to "speedy delete" the file. --[[User:Closeapple|Closeapple]] ([[User talk:Closeapple|talk]]) 10:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:The reason that files like this get deleted so quickly is that Commons gets a lot of uploads from confused users that scan or photograph or crop someone else's copyrighted work and then claim "own work" based on having scanned or photographed or changed it. You happen to be the rare exception: From what you have said, you have scanned what is really your own original work, after it has been passed through another medium. An OTRS ticket should hold off the wolves at the door until a real decision is made: Once you have sent e-mail with the filenames you are uploading, put [[Template:OP|{{subst:OP}}]] somewhere in the information text on that file. Hopefully that will give fair warning not to "speedy delete" the file. --[[User:Closeapple|Closeapple]] ([[User talk:Closeapple|talk]]) 10:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
+

 
+
== Possible problems ==
 
+
[[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karta1.PNG]] and [[Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karta2.PNG]]. [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Derivative_works#Maps In the United States, many maps are in the public domain. The most common cases are:...As a result of the court decisions, following parts of a map are in the public domain, and may be used freely: ...'''Geographic or topographic features. Those are facts, and facts aren't copyrightable''']. But [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3AKarta2.PNG&diff=92620591&oldid=92561056 Only those elements that involve no creativity are public domain. In Mason v Montgomery Data et al 1992, the court found that there was creativity involved in " each mapmaker's selection of sources, interpretation of those sources, discretion in reconciling inconsistencies among the sources, and skill and judgment in depicting the information." The ruling in that case describes a similar circumstance to this map: "But the evidence in this case demonstrates that Mason exercised sufficient creativity when he created his maps. In his deposition and affidavit, Mason explained the choices that he independently made to select information from numerous and sometimes conflicting sources, and to depict that information on his maps.10 Mason's compilation of the information on his maps involved creativity that far exceeds the required minimum level." In other words, if the map is just an outline of the state of Texas and some dots for cities, it's ineligible for protection. But if the author puts skill into selecting elements to include on the map, then it's copyrighted. --UserB (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)] [[User:Strannik27|Strannik27]] [[User:Strannik27|Strannik27]] ([[User talk:Strannik27|talk]]) 12:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump/Copyright&diff=92676481&oldid=92674425