22 Mar

Commons:Village pump

‎policy proposal:time-stamp watermarks
← Older revision
Revision as of 06:49, 22 March 2013
Line 871:
Line 871:

::Claims that policy is too obvious to write is fine when nobody is arguing and blocking people. In this case, each block becomes a defacto policy discussion page. You say it's ok and everyone should be smart enough to think like you, then 5 minutes from now you'll be wanting to block someone over an issue equally trivial as a timestamp. So it needs to be written AS policy, and to do that we need something to LINK to, a discussion, a consensus. Or just argue forever more, whatever is good for you. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 05:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

::Claims that policy is too obvious to write is fine when nobody is arguing and blocking people. In this case, each block becomes a defacto policy discussion page. You say it's ok and everyone should be smart enough to think like you, then 5 minutes from now you'll be wanting to block someone over an issue equally trivial as a timestamp. So it needs to be written AS policy, and to do that we need something to LINK to, a discussion, a consensus. Or just argue forever more, whatever is good for you. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 05:46, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

+
:::Nobody is arguing and blocking over timestamp watermarks (well, other than you... and now me thank you very much). So let's not make an issue where none exists. Concentrate the discussion on attribution watermarks. Preferrably the ones where some dear sweet soul uploads a thousand images with ''[http://www.google.com/search?q=eat+at+joes&tbm=isch "Eat at Joe's"]'' scrawled across each one. – [[User:Jbarta|JBarta]] ([[User talk:Jbarta#top|talk]]) 06:49, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

= March 21 =

= March 21 =

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&diff=93070660&oldid=93070591