22 Mar

Commons:Village pump

‎discussion
← Older revision
Revision as of 12:21, 22 March 2013
Line 864:
Line 864:

::::Well, I think camera manufacturers added that at the request of users. In the digital camera age it is of course utter nonsense to "burn" the date/time into the image, rather than using file date/time and exif. Anyway, again, if the original has the date/time "burned in" and no clean original is available, it should be accepted (and cleaned), provided the picture is worthwhile. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 04:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

::::Well, I think camera manufacturers added that at the request of users. In the digital camera age it is of course utter nonsense to "burn" the date/time into the image, rather than using file date/time and exif. Anyway, again, if the original has the date/time "burned in" and no clean original is available, it should be accepted (and cleaned), provided the picture is worthwhile. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 04:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

* {{comment}} I see people supporting here. But can someone please highlight the proposal that is being supported? Maybe in some different colour? This is difficult to understand exactly which statement is being supported. Its just a matter of one "no" and the whole statement turns opposite and then its a whole mess. Please! §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|Dharmadhyaksha]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]} 12:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

* {{comment}} I see people supporting here. But can someone please highlight the proposal that is being supported? Maybe in some different colour? This is difficult to understand exactly which statement is being supported. Its just a matter of one "no" and the whole statement turns opposite and then its a whole mess. Please! §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|Dharmadhyaksha]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]} 12:07, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

+
::I understand what you are saying, and this is not just a problem here, but is rather indicative of the chaos of blocking that is going on over watermarks in general. I shall need to restructure this whole thing, because 'discussion' is not clear enough for some. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 12:21, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

===policy proposal:time-stamp watermarks===

===policy proposal:time-stamp watermarks===

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&diff=93082341&oldid=93082102