Commons:Village pump

‎What happened to Special:MovePage in the dropdown?: +1
← Older revision
Revision as of 00:48, 20 March 2013
Line 808:
Line 808:
 
:::I'll make some changes later today so it is easier to disable the gadget(s)/ certain functionality. At this stage, the gadgets RenameLink, QuickDelete and Autodel depend on AjaxQuickDelete if any of them is enabled, AjaxQuickDelete is loaded (and unfortunately it messes with the UI which is very bad practise for a gadget that is reused). The plan is to break AjaxQuickDelete into a "core" (as invisible gadget) and creating separate gadgets for the links. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 10:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:::I'll make some changes later today so it is easier to disable the gadget(s)/ certain functionality. At this stage, the gadgets RenameLink, QuickDelete and Autodel depend on AjaxQuickDelete if any of them is enabled, AjaxQuickDelete is loaded (and unfortunately it messes with the UI which is very bad practise for a gadget that is reused). The plan is to break AjaxQuickDelete into a "core" (as invisible gadget) and creating separate gadgets for the links. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 10:27, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 

 

−
::::I've disabled all those gadgets you've mentioned, and things are back to how it should be. I seriously think all these addons should be disabled by default; only available as an option in Prefs. Not the other way around, where the user should disable ''addons''... Not being a pest, but is there any consensus on whether or not these should be enabled by default? Because I for one would '''strongly oppose''' enabling them by default. [[User:Rehman|Reh]][[User talk:Rehman|man]] 13:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
+
::::I've disabled all those gadgets you've mentioned, and things are back to how it should be. I seriously think all these addons should be disabled by default; only available as an option in Prefs. Not the other way around, where the user should disable ''addons''... Not being a pest, but is there any consensus on whether or not these should be enabled by default? Because I for one would strongly oppose enabling them by default. [[User:Rehman|Reh]][[User talk:Rehman|man]] 13:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 

 

 
:::::There are good reasons for the ''Nominate for deletion'' link and also for ''Move&Replace'' (which is generally accepted for quite a while) here at Commons. Do you really want filemovers manually adding their request to the delinker page or do you intend asking people to create deletion requests by hand? Or seeking for reasons why they do not have a move link on file pages? If you are not convinced, you are free asking the community whether they want these options disabled. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 23:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:::::There are good reasons for the ''Nominate for deletion'' link and also for ''Move&Replace'' (which is generally accepted for quite a while) here at Commons. Do you really want filemovers manually adding their request to the delinker page or do you intend asking people to create deletion requests by hand? Or seeking for reasons why they do not have a move link on file pages? If you are not convinced, you are free asking the community whether they want these options disabled. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 23:47, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
+

 
+
::::::I guess you're right; there's more good to it than bad (considering the fact that we can easily disable it). Thanks. [[User:Rehman|Reh]][[User talk:Rehman|man]] 00:48, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
 

 

 
== Noncommercial by the back door ==
 
== Noncommercial by the back door ==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Village_pump&diff=92911591&oldid=92910185