20 Mar

Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests

‎File:Habemus Papam 2013.ogg
← Older revision
Revision as of 23:14, 20 March 2013
Line 22:
Line 22:

* {{Comment}} I doubt the simple reading of a non-original sentence can be seen as a performance. I'm not sure I understand why Russavia and Odder are so cautious in this specific case. (From a speculative point of view, we do acknowledge PD-scan and PD-Art; must a straightforward recording always be copyrighted?) [[User:Jastrow|Jastrow]] ([[User talk:Jastrow|Λέγετε]]) 23:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

* {{Comment}} I doubt the simple reading of a non-original sentence can be seen as a performance. I'm not sure I understand why Russavia and Odder are so cautious in this specific case. (From a speculative point of view, we do acknowledge PD-scan and PD-Art; must a straightforward recording always be copyrighted?) [[User:Jastrow|Jastrow]] ([[User talk:Jastrow|Λέγετε]]) 23:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

::This is not comparable to {{tl|PD-scan}} or {{tl|PD-Art}} where we have an original work that is PD and where we assume the digitization itself to be PD as well. In this case, the uploader claims to have this speech recorded himself. Hence, we have to consider whether the speech can be considered PD and whether the uploader can be trusted in his statement that he recorded it. I guess that Russavia and Odder were somewhat sceptical as we had apparently a significant flow of copyvios coming on that day in relation to the new pope. --[[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 16:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

::This is not comparable to {{tl|PD-scan}} or {{tl|PD-Art}} where we have an original work that is PD and where we assume the digitization itself to be PD as well. In this case, the uploader claims to have this speech recorded himself. Hence, we have to consider whether the speech can be considered PD and whether the uploader can be trusted in his statement that he recorded it. I guess that Russavia and Odder were somewhat sceptical as we had apparently a significant flow of copyvios coming on that day in relation to the new pope. --[[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 16:11, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

+
:::Regarding the case itself, I think the speech is PD-old and that its reading by Cardinal Tauran is PD-ineligible. As for the recording, I'm unsure what more we can ask from Majoritems: a written (OTRS) statement? Regarding the PD-Art/PD-scan comparison, my point here is that merely pressing the 'REC' button on a recording machine probably doesn't warrant a copyright any more than pressing the 'copy' button on a scanner does. --[[User:Jastrow|Jastrow]] ([[User talk:Jastrow|Λέγετε]]) 23:14, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

{{udelh}}

{{udelh}}

+

== [[File:ForestAfterHarvesting.jpg]] ==

== [[File:ForestAfterHarvesting.jpg]] ==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&diff=92977593&oldid=92975608