14 Mar

Commons talk:Valued image candidates/candidate list

‎Old VICs
← Older revision
Revision as of 15:27, 14 March 2013
Line 120:
Line 120:

::An other option is to change their status to "withdrawn". They will be archived here then: [[:Category:Withdrawn valued image candidates]], without needing any action of VICbot. --[[User:Myrabella|Myrabella]] ([[User talk:Myrabella|talk]]) 11:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

::An other option is to change their status to "withdrawn". They will be archived here then: [[:Category:Withdrawn valued image candidates]], without needing any action of VICbot. --[[User:Myrabella|Myrabella]] ([[User talk:Myrabella|talk]]) 11:37, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

:::In cases where other nominations were created, the old ones could simply be deleted then. Save some minuscule of our server space! For others, withdrawn is a good idea. I would still want to probably go through them and see if something really valuable is in it. We can re-nominate it. §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|Dharmadhyaksha]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]} 11:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

:::In cases where other nominations were created, the old ones could simply be deleted then. Save some minuscule of our server space! For others, withdrawn is a good idea. I would still want to probably go through them and see if something really valuable is in it. We can re-nominate it. §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|Dharmadhyaksha]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]} 11:53, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

+
*'' What do we do about these? If i add them now in the list, the bot will close them as some are as old as 2009. '' It seems that the bot will not close anything until some action is taken manually to trigger the bot. If there is a way to set up another (temporary section) to come after VIC, MVR, VISC which could be archival un-assessed VIC. If set up the same way as the others, we should be able to add the VIC pagename to the section's menu causing the nomination to reappear. Perhaps we set the guidelines that anyone pulling an old file for re-consideration must give their support and then follow a strict 48-72 hour closure period for those with no comments other than the supporting re-nominator. Any objections/comments and it follows the regular timeline for closure. If every interested party has a 2-4 weeks(?) to review each page, we can delete remaining archived unassessed VIC on regular intervals. Just a thought, if everyone wants a chance to review the material in the event some belong... --[[User:Godot13|Godot13]] ([[User talk:Godot13|talk]]) 15:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Valued_image_candidates/candidate_list&diff=92568396&oldid=92567238