Commons talk:Freedom of panorama
Morocco
← Older revision
Revision as of 04:57, 22 March 2013
Line 221:
Line 221:
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 10 above, it shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless the image of the work is the main subject of such a reproduction, broadcast or communication and if it is used for commercial purposes.}}
Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 10 above, it shall be permitted, without the author’s authorization or payment of a fee, to republish, broadcast or communicate to the public by cable an image of a work of architecture, a work of fine art, a photographic work, or a work of applied art which is permanently located in a place open to the public, unless the image of the work is the main subject of such a reproduction, broadcast or communication and if it is used for commercial purposes.}}
where Article 10 is about economic rights. This clearly contradicts the advice that we give. I believe that we are in error in our advice unless we can demonstrate that there is case law to the contrary. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]'' 04:51, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
where Article 10 is about economic rights. This clearly contradicts the advice that we give. I believe that we are in error in our advice unless we can demonstrate that there is case law to the contrary. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]'' 04:51, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
+
: Why does that contradict the advice we give? If the image of the work is the main subject of the photo, and it is used for commercial purposes, it is not permitted.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 04:57, 22 March 2013 (UTC)