Commons talk:Freedom of panorama
Morocco: sorry
← Older revision
Revision as of 08:32, 28 March 2013
Line 190:
Line 190:
::Our advice contradicts the law because we're saying that uses have to be ''both'' incidental ''and'' non-commercial, while the law says they have to be ''either'' incidental ''or'' non-commercial. Incidental here meaning "not the main subject of such a reproduction", this might give us much better FOP than our usual de minimis cases (not similar to France at all). -- [[User:Orionist|'''Orionist''']] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|talk]] 04:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
::Our advice contradicts the law because we're saying that uses have to be ''both'' incidental ''and'' non-commercial, while the law says they have to be ''either'' incidental ''or'' non-commercial. Incidental here meaning "not the main subject of such a reproduction", this might give us much better FOP than our usual de minimis cases (not similar to France at all). -- [[User:Orionist|'''Orionist''']] ★ [[User talk:Orionist|talk]] 04:42, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
−
:::As explained by billinghurst and Orionist, if I understand them correctly because I don't practice much English, I agree with him, and believe it's a case of [[en:logical conjunction|logical conjunction]]. Some people around me, asked for their opinions, agree also. Here is a synthetic table that summarizes my perception regarding the case of Morocco (but not only, I'm also thinking for example of Mozambique).
+
:::As explained by billinghurst and Orionist, if I understand them correctly because I don't practice much English, I agree with them, and believe it's a case of [[en:logical conjunction|logical conjunction]]. Some people around me, asked for their opinions, agree also. Here is a synthetic table that summarizes my perception regarding the case of Morocco (but not only, I'm also thinking for example of Mozambique).
{| class="wikitable alternance centre"
{| class="wikitable alternance centre"
|+ AND
|+ AND