22 Mar

Commons talk:Freedom of panorama

‎challenge the Slovenian interpretation: corr
← Older revision
Revision as of 09:54, 22 March 2013
Line 193:
Line 193:

To me that clearly indicates that FoP is allowable in 2-D representation of 3-D, ie. you can take photographs, when you are doing such in a public space. I believe that we should be changing our interpretation unless there is case law to the contrary. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]'' 03:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

To me that clearly indicates that FoP is allowable in 2-D representation of 3-D, ie. you can take photographs, when you are doing such in a public space. I believe that we should be changing our interpretation unless there is case law to the contrary. — [[user:billinghurst|billinghurst]] ''[[user talk:billinghurst|sDrewth]]'' 03:19, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

−
:The article allows only for free non-commercial use, no matter whether the reproduction is 2D or 3D. This has also been stated e.g. [http://www.fa.uni-lj.si/filelib/9_ar/2010/ar2010_2_08.pdf here] (pg. 67), where the author clearly states that commercial reproduction (e.g. for postcards [which of course are 2D]) is not allowed. There has also been a court case, where a publisher had to pay a sculptor a restitution for having used a photo of his sculpture in a book.[http://www.sodisce.si/vislj/odlocitve/35579/] --[[User:Eleassar|Eleassar]] ^{[[User talk:Eleassar|(t/p)]]} 09:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:The article allows only for free non-commercial use, when the reproduction is 2D, and no reproduction at all in 3D. This has also been stated e.g. [http://www.fa.uni-lj.si/filelib/9_ar/2010/ar2010_2_08.pdf here] (pg. 67), where the author clearly states that commercial reproduction (e.g. for postcards [which of course are 2D]) is not allowed. There has also been a court case, where a publisher had to pay a sculptor a restitution for having used a photo of his sculpture in a book.[http://www.sodisce.si/vislj/odlocitve/35579/] --[[User:Eleassar|Eleassar]] ^{[[User talk:Eleassar|(t/p)]]} 09:15, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

:As Eleassar notes, yes that allows for 2-D representations of 3-D objects, but only if not used for economic gain. All three conditions of part (2) must be satisfied. The first two would not be a problem here (the second part just prohibits photos which are essentially copies of other photos or 2-D works), but the third is the problem. So usually legal, but such photos are non-free. [[User:Clindberg|Carl Lindberg]] ([[User talk:Clindberg|talk]]) 09:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

:As Eleassar notes, yes that allows for 2-D representations of 3-D objects, but only if not used for economic gain. All three conditions of part (2) must be satisfied. The first two would not be a problem here (the second part just prohibits photos which are essentially copies of other photos or 2-D works), but the third is the problem. So usually legal, but such photos are non-free. [[User:Clindberg|Carl Lindberg]] ([[User talk:Clindberg|talk]]) 09:31, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Freedom_of_panorama&diff=93077082&oldid=93076706