Commons talk:Featured picture candidates
Delisting reform
← Older revision
Revision as of 12:01, 17 March 2013
Line 107:
Line 107:
Would any other people like to comment? -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|♥]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|♦]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|♣]] ♠ 08:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
Would any other people like to comment? -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|♥]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|♦]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|♣]] ♠ 08:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
−
*'''Support with expansion''' I think the Delist and replace is far too limited for historical works. As long as it's clearly the same image, it should be fine.
+
*'''Support, except oppose D&R restrictions as described in rest of this comment''' I think the Delist and replace is far too limited for historical works. If the Library of Congress releases a new, better scan of an image - which they regularly do - we should be able to delist and replace, for example. I'd say anything that's clearly the same image is fine for D&R. [[User:Adam Cuerden|Adam Cuerden]] ([[User talk:Adam Cuerden|talk]]) 12:01, 17 March 2013 (UTC)