Commons talk:Featured picture candidates
Delisting reform: re to Dschwen
← Older revision
Revision as of 05:32, 19 March 2013
Line 129:
Line 129:
****No, but we do not need delisting for that. This generates twice the work necessary. Just nominate the new one as a ''replacement'' for the old one. Then you only need one voting process. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] ([[User talk:Dschwen|talk]]) 03:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
****No, but we do not need delisting for that. This generates twice the work necessary. Just nominate the new one as a ''replacement'' for the old one. Then you only need one voting process. --[[User:Dschwen|Dschwen]] ([[User talk:Dschwen|talk]]) 03:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
*****So you mean only D&R is required; no simple Delists? I too not comfortable with a delist if no better image available at that time. But if "replacing one person's photo with another person's photo should be a no-no", then the situation is very difficult. I expect more maturity from our senior contributors if some body come with a better picture to replace their's. I wish many new comers will arrive and replace all of my FPs. [[User:Jkadavoor|J]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|Kadavoor]] [[Special:Contributions/Jkadavoor|J]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|e]][[Special:ListFiles/Jkadavoor|e]] 04:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
*****So you mean only D&R is required; no simple Delists? I too not comfortable with a delist if no better image available at that time. But if "replacing one person's photo with another person's photo should be a no-no", then the situation is very difficult. I expect more maturity from our senior contributors if some body come with a better picture to replace their's. I wish many new comers will arrive and replace all of my FPs. [[User:Jkadavoor|J]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|Kadavoor]] [[Special:Contributions/Jkadavoor|J]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|e]][[Special:ListFiles/Jkadavoor|e]] 04:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
+
*****OK, so you agree with #2, good. However, with #1, nothing is being changed other than the placement of delisting noms. As I said, if you want to get rid of delisting noms altogether then make that proposal. But for #1 we are deciding the question: Given that delisting noms are to take place, where should they occur? -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|♥]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|♦]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|♣]] ♠ 05:32, 19 March 2013 (UTC)