17 Mar

Commons talk:Featured picture candidates

‎Delisting reform: any others?
← Older revision
Revision as of 08:49, 17 March 2013
Line 105:
Line 105:

*{{s}} Agree about the inclusion of a provision for "delist & replace" nominations; it is good for easy replacing of an inferior version. I'm not happy with the current simultaneous "feature" and "delist" nominations. Reviewers are not very interested in a "delist" request; it is usually considered as a routine task of the admins (as a cleaning up job). It is good to move them upward and merge with the regular nominations. But chances that people ignore them as now. (What about the codes required for the FPCBot?) [[User:Jkadavoor|J]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|Kadavoor]] [[Special:Contributions/Jkadavoor|J]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|e]][[Special:ListFiles/Jkadavoor|e]] 06:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

*{{s}} Agree about the inclusion of a provision for "delist & replace" nominations; it is good for easy replacing of an inferior version. I'm not happy with the current simultaneous "feature" and "delist" nominations. Reviewers are not very interested in a "delist" request; it is usually considered as a routine task of the admins (as a cleaning up job). It is good to move them upward and merge with the regular nominations. But chances that people ignore them as now. (What about the codes required for the FPCBot?) [[User:Jkadavoor|J]][[User talk:Jkadavoor|Kadavoor]] [[Special:Contributions/Jkadavoor|J]][[:Category:User:Jkadavoor|e]][[Special:ListFiles/Jkadavoor|e]] 06:07, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

+

+
Would any other people like to comment? -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|♥]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|♦]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|♣]] ♠ 08:49, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Featured_picture_candidates&diff=92741803&oldid=92522530