Commons talk:Criteria for speedy deletion
Content added while evading a block or ban: comment
← Older revision
Revision as of 22:44, 29 March 2013
Line 1,075:
Line 1,075:
*{{o}} Mostly per Jim. --[[User:Herbythyme|Herby]] [[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]] 13:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
*{{o}} Mostly per Jim. --[[User:Herbythyme|Herby]] [[User talk:Herbythyme|talk thyme]] 13:53, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
+
* {{comment}} I'm seeing multiple problems here:
+
: If someone identifies a copyright problem, I'd prefer if the copyright problem is taken seriously instead of being speedily redacted. Therefore, I don't think that this deletion criterion should apply to deletion requests or addition of other deletion tags such as {{tl|copyvio}}.
+
: If someone uploads an image and adds it to a different project, we are causing trouble to that project by deleting that image, unless the user's contributions also are unwanted on that other project. Keep in mind that file information pages only tell if a file is in use on a Wikimedia Foundation project. It might be in use on another project somewhere and deletion would cause problems to that project. It may be fine to speedily delete recently uploaded files unused on other Wikimedia Foundation projects, though.
+
: The proposal is not clear about what to do if the blocked user uploads an image to Wikipedia or Flickr which is later copied to Commons by another user. Should that image also be speedily deleted as it was originally uploaded by a sockpuppet? This may also mean problems with the way Commons tries to be a media repository for other projects. --[[User:Stefan4|Stefan4]] ([[User talk:Stefan4|talk]]) 22:44, 29 March 2013 (UTC)