25 Mar

Commons talk:Criteria for speedy deletion

‎Content added while evading a block or ban: gr.
← Older revision
Revision as of 19:31, 25 March 2013
Line 1,066:
Line 1,066:

:::::: When I had to decide whether speedy or not I often also consulted this page besides using Common Sense. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 19:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

:::::: When I had to decide whether speedy or not I often also consulted this page besides using Common Sense. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 19:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

−
If it would be worded ''Pages in any namespace created by banned or blocked users (at Commons) evading their ban or block and fitting any other deletion or speedy-deletion criterion or intended for disruption […]'', or similar. And when not being applied retrospective (if it turns out after 1 year that it was created by a blocked user) = There must be a reasonable time-limit., I could support it. I just fear seeing overly hasty admins destroy useful stuff like in one case I know from en.wp. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 19:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
+
If it would be worded ''Pages in any namespace created by banned or blocked users (at Commons) evading their ban or block and fitting any other deletion or speedy-deletion criterion or intended for disruption […]'', or similar. And when not being applied retrospective (if it turns out after 1 year that it was created by a blocked user) = There must be a reasonable time-limit., I could support it. I just fear seeing overly hasty admins destroying useful stuff like in one case I know from en.wp. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''^{[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]]} 19:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons_talk:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion&diff=93269018&oldid=93268955