Commons talk:Abuse filter
Report by Oliver H: cmt
← Older revision
Revision as of 21:11, 25 March 2013
Line 336:
Line 336:
*'''Comments:''' This is annoying and the automated filter do not disallow writing _GAY_ using underscores. Therefore from my point of view, this rule is unconstructive. Note I have already reported a similar bug some hours ago but with less precision as I was not sure about the issue. I propose to improve the tool giving the possibility to the contributor to force the submit if he thinks his writing is constructive. Why not? [[User:Oliver H|Oliver H]] ([[User talk:Oliver H|talk]]) 16:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comments:''' This is annoying and the automated filter do not disallow writing _GAY_ using underscores. Therefore from my point of view, this rule is unconstructive. Note I have already reported a similar bug some hours ago but with less precision as I was not sure about the issue. I propose to improve the tool giving the possibility to the contributor to force the submit if he thinks his writing is constructive. Why not? [[User:Oliver H|Oliver H]] ([[User talk:Oliver H|talk]]) 16:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
*:Apologies for the issue. I have reduced the number of edits required to bypass the filter from 200 to 50. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|♥]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|♦]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|♣]] ♠ 02:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
*:Apologies for the issue. I have reduced the number of edits required to bypass the filter from 200 to 50. -- [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|♥]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|♦]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|♣]] ♠ 02:34, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
+
*:Please do not use underscores to bypass the filter. This is neither the intended solution nor is it nice. Thank you. -- ''[[User:Rillke|Rillke]]''[[User talk:Rillke|(q?)]] 21:11, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
==Report by 112.79.41.57==
==Report by 112.79.41.57==