Commons talk:Abuse filter
_GAY_ disallowed because identified as potentially unconstructive: new section
← Older revision
Revision as of 16:36, 23 March 2013
Line 327:
Line 327:
*'''Edit kind:''' adding a new topic ''[RenameLink] modification aborted by an extension hook'' in Village Pump
*'''Edit kind:''' adding a new topic ''[RenameLink] modification aborted by an extension hook'' in Village Pump
*'''Comments:''' The filename contains the world '''_GAY_''' [[:File:Vaut_mieux_un_mariage_GAY_qu_un_mariage_triste.jpeg]]
If you remove the underscores within the filename you cannot submit the text! [[User:Oliver H|Oliver H]] ([[User talk:Oliver H|talk]]) 09:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Comments:''' The filename contains the world '''_GAY_''' [[:File:Vaut_mieux_un_mariage_GAY_qu_un_mariage_triste.jpeg]]
If you remove the underscores within the filename you cannot submit the text! [[User:Oliver H|Oliver H]] ([[User talk:Oliver H|talk]]) 09:53, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
+
+
== _GAY_ disallowed because identified as potentially unconstructive ==
+
+
==Report by Oliver H==
+
*'''Report by:''' {{User8|Oliver H}}
+
*'''Page name:''' {{Page|[[:File:Mieux vaut un mariage_GAY_qu'un mariage triste.jpg]]}}
+
*'''Edit kind:''' In the picture description, remove the [[w:underscore]]s of the word _GAY_, then save => ''An automated filter has identified this edit as potentially unconstructive, and it has been disallowed''.
+
*'''Comments:''' This is annoying and the automated filter do not disallow writing _GAY_ using underscores. Therefore from my point of view, this rule is unconstructive. Note I have already reported a similar bug some hours ago but with less precision as I was not sure about the issue. I propose to improve the tool giving the possibility to the contributor to force the submit if he thinks his writing is constructive. Why not? [[User:Oliver H|Oliver H]] ([[User talk:Oliver H|talk]]) 16:36, 23 March 2013 (UTC)