Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list
File:Sikorsky_S-70i_Black_Hawk_SP-YVC_ILA_2012_02.jpg: re
← Older revision
Revision as of 08:26, 15 March 2013
Line 907:
Line 907:
===File:Sikorsky_S-70i_Black_Hawk_SP-YVC_ILA_2012_02.jpg===
===File:Sikorsky_S-70i_Black_Hawk_SP-YVC_ILA_2012_02.jpg===
[[File:Sikorsky_S-70i_Black_Hawk_SP-YVC_ILA_2012_02.jpg|200px]]
[[File:Sikorsky_S-70i_Black_Hawk_SP-YVC_ILA_2012_02.jpg|200px]]
−
{{/Discuss|Sikorsky S-70i Black Hawk --[[User:Julian Herzog|Julian Herzog]] 07:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:ArildV|ArildV]] 11:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Isn't it overexposed? [[User:Mattbuck|Mattbuck]] 10:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)}}
+
{{/Discuss|Sikorsky S-70i Black Hawk --[[User:Julian Herzog|Julian Herzog]] 07:50, 5 March 2013 (UTC)|Good quality. --[[User:ArildV|ArildV]] 11:24, 10 March 2013 (UTC)
Isn't it overexposed? [[User:Mattbuck|Mattbuck]] 10:33, 14 March 2013 (UTC)
{{comment}} I don't think it is. The subject (helicopter) is actually mostly in the lower part of the histogram. Apart from that, in my opinion, the only benchmark for overexposure is that no whites should be clipped, so no part of the image should be fully white. That's not the case here. Even the brightest areas have structure. --[[User:Julian Herzog|Julian Herzog]] 08:25, 15 March 2013 (UTC)}}
===File:Schlosstrasse-Muelheim-2013.jpg===
===File:Schlosstrasse-Muelheim-2013.jpg===