Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list

‎File:2012.08.17.-07-Vogelstangsee Mannheim-Große Heidelibelle-Maennchen-Schnitt.jpg
← Older revision
Revision as of 18:37, 19 March 2013
Line 1,149:
Line 1,149:
 
===File:2012.08.17.-07-Vogelstangsee Mannheim-Große Heidelibelle-Maennchen-Schnitt.jpg===
 
===File:2012.08.17.-07-Vogelstangsee Mannheim-Große Heidelibelle-Maennchen-Schnitt.jpg===
 
[[File:2012.08.17.-07-Vogelstangsee Mannheim-Große Heidelibelle-Maennchen-Schnitt.jpg|200px]]
 
[[File:2012.08.17.-07-Vogelstangsee Mannheim-Große Heidelibelle-Maennchen-Schnitt.jpg|200px]]
−
{{/Discuss|Große Heidelibelle, Männchen (Common Darter, male) - Sympetrum striolatum in the shade under trees -- [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 20:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC) |{{o}} Good quality but bad crop (see top) --[[User:Poco a poco|Poco a poco]] 22:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC) {{Info}} This is no crop on the top. Just right and left a bit. The intention was to take close-ups of the body and so on.-- [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 06:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC) -- I'd like a second opinion. The wings were not important in this photo series. There are macro shots of the head, torso, legs, etc.. The animal is not cut! [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 19:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
{{o}}The wings are always important for the identification of dragonflies. Shooting is interesting, but the light is bad, it would take two flashes. No QI for me. --[[User:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] 09:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
+
{{/Decline|Große Heidelibelle, Männchen (Common Darter, male) - Sympetrum striolatum in the shade under trees -- [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 20:24, 4 March 2013 (UTC) |{{o}} Good quality but bad crop (see top) --[[User:Poco a poco|Poco a poco]] 22:09, 4 March 2013 (UTC) {{Info}} This is no crop on the top. Just right and left a bit. The intention was to take close-ups of the body and so on.-- [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 06:44, 5 March 2013 (UTC) -- I'd like a second opinion. The wings were not important in this photo series. There are macro shots of the head, torso, legs, etc.. The animal is not cut! [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 19:03, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
{{o}}The wings are always important for the identification of dragonflies. Shooting is interesting, but the light is bad, it would take two flashes. No QI for me. --[[User:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] 09:28, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**{{comment}} Hm, the wings of these dragonfly won't say you what it is. Important for the identification of these "Heidelibelle" (Sympetrum) are other things. For example: The black line between the eyes. Do they go down a bit on the outer edge of the eyes? The color of the legs. Are they yellow on one side? The markings (or drawings) on the sides of the thorax and on the abdomen. Then the color of the animal in general. Does it have a "Kopulationsorgan" (in englisch: copulary?)? If yes, it is a male. Does it have a "Legeröhre" (in englisch: ovipositor?)? If yes, it is a female. A very important question for indentification is how is the shape of the "Legeröhre" in the females. And so on. Anyway, I accept your opinions but don't understand the oppose. [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] ([[User talk:Hockei|talk]]) 16:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**{{comment}} Hm, the wings of these dragonfly won't say you what it is. Important for the identification of these "Heidelibelle" (Sympetrum) are other things. For example: The black line between the eyes. Do they go down a bit on the outer edge of the eyes? The color of the legs. Are they yellow on one side? The markings (or drawings) on the sides of the thorax and on the abdomen. Then the color of the animal in general. Does it have a "Kopulationsorgan" (in englisch: copulary?)? If yes, it is a male. Does it have a "Legeröhre" (in englisch: ovipositor?)? If yes, it is a female. A very important question for indentification is how is the shape of the "Legeröhre" in the females. And so on. Anyway, I accept your opinions but don't understand the oppose. [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] ([[User talk:Hockei|talk]]) 16:05, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 
* {{comm}} We all know this, my observation is of a general nature. I do not see the wings. This is due to poor lighting. It takes a second flash on the side hand-held. It's not QI. --[[User:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] 18:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
 
* {{comm}} We all know this, my observation is of a general nature. I do not see the wings. This is due to poor lighting. It takes a second flash on the side hand-held. It's not QI. --[[User:Archaeodontosaurus|Archaeodontosaurus]] 18:43, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Line 1,161:
Line 1,161:
 
** {{cmt}} Why always make the same kind of pictures of dragonflies? They're not bad, just different. I like this series of photos anyway and I'm not the only one. [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 15:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 
** {{cmt}} Why always make the same kind of pictures of dragonflies? They're not bad, just different. I like this series of photos anyway and I'm not the only one. [[User:Hockei|Hockei]] 15:57, 11 March 2013 (UTC)
 
***Thanks. Try to shoot in natural lights as much as possible for [[:en:In vivo|In vivo]]. Flash cause dark background and reflection in many body parts. (The [[:File:Tramea_Limbata_by_kadavoor.JPG|unusual angle of view]] (from below) in this case is interesting to me.) [[User:Jkadavoor|Jkadavoor]] 08:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
 
***Thanks. Try to shoot in natural lights as much as possible for [[:en:In vivo|In vivo]]. Flash cause dark background and reflection in many body parts. (The [[:File:Tramea_Limbata_by_kadavoor.JPG|unusual angle of view]] (from below) in this case is interesting to me.) [[User:Jkadavoor|Jkadavoor]] 08:11, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
−
}}
+
{{QICresult|2|3|--[[User:Iifar|Iifar]] 18:37, 19 March 2013 (UTC)}}}}
 

 

 
===File:Lörrach-Stetten-Fridolinkirche1.jpg===
 
===File:Lörrach-Stetten-Fridolinkirche1.jpg===

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Quality_images_candidates/candidate_list&diff=92889065&oldid=92888980