19 Mar

Commons:License review/requests

‎DrKiernan
← Older revision
Revision as of 19:42, 19 March 2013
Line 22:
Line 22:

**The purpose of review is to ensure a second pair of eyes on a file, that would be defeated by reviewing your own uploads (see [[Commons:License review#Instructions for reviewers]]: "image-reviewers may not review their own uploads"). I believe both those licenses are OK, providing they are not nc or nd. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 18:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

**The purpose of review is to ensure a second pair of eyes on a file, that would be defeated by reviewing your own uploads (see [[Commons:License review#Instructions for reviewers]]: "image-reviewers may not review their own uploads"). I believe both those licenses are OK, providing they are not nc or nd. [[User:DrKiernan|DrKiernan]] ([[User talk:DrKiernan|talk]]) 18:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

*{{Support}} - anyone who can make it through the mess that is RFA on ENWP is qualified enough imo. [[User:Mono|'''Mono''']] 15:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

*{{Support}} - anyone who can make it through the mess that is RFA on ENWP is qualified enough imo. [[User:Mono|'''Mono''']] 15:50, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

+
*{{Support}} user is familiar with Commons policy and commons licenses--[[User:Steinsplitter|Steinsplitter]] ([[User talk:Steinsplitter|talk]]) 19:42, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

{{frh}}

{{frh}}

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:License_review/requests&diff=92895382&oldid=92889927