21 Mar

Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop

‎Sede vacante
← Older revision
Revision as of 06:21, 21 March 2013
Line 1,255:
Line 1,255:

:::Nor does Jpg, Svg or the Internet in general, but today, the Vatican is using all three. I guess you can't stop progress. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 10:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

:::Nor does Jpg, Svg or the Internet in general, but today, the Vatican is using all three. I guess you can't stop progress. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 10:48, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

::::I wasn't referring to technical image formats, but to artistic styles. [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 15:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

::::I wasn't referring to technical image formats, but to artistic styles. [[User:AnonMoos|AnonMoos]] ([[User talk:AnonMoos|talk]]) 15:43, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

+
:::::Well, the Sede vacante has often turned up on coins, they don't work so well here, and as for [[:File:COA sede vacante San Giovanni in Laterano 2006-09-07.jpg|works in marble like this]] well, just don't get me started on the [http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Better_arrow_draft.png&oldid=89848369 problems with marble] so we're stuck with computer FX and photographic images until advances like smell-o-vision from futurama arrive. I think the thrust of your argument is that because all previous images have been entirely 2-D then all future images should follow suit. I don't see it. I see the relentless march of svg into places it just _should_not_go_ and don't say a word, because it's like, ok I guess. As for artistic style I was asking for input there, and haven't had any. Plus, seems like demand has died. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 06:20, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

==WikiDittoThink==

==WikiDittoThink==

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop&diff=92992142&oldid=92975594