Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Djupfjorden, 2010 09.jpg
File:Djupfjorden, 2010 09.jpg
← Older revision
Revision as of 14:43, 25 March 2013
Line 29:
Line 29:
*{{s}} -- [[User:-donald-|-donald-]] ([[User talk:-donald-|talk]]) 11:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
*{{s}} -- [[User:-donald-|-donald-]] ([[User talk:-donald-|talk]]) 11:09, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
*{{s}} Motive, level of detail and quality is impressive. I also like the compositon and reflections on the water. One minor aspect distracts me a bit: The top-cutted inclining mountain at the very left side, but it does not change my supporting vote. --[[User:Tuxyso|Tuxyso]] ([[User talk:Tuxyso|talk]]) 13:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
*{{s}} Motive, level of detail and quality is impressive. I also like the compositon and reflections on the water. One minor aspect distracts me a bit: The top-cutted inclining mountain at the very left side, but it does not change my supporting vote. --[[User:Tuxyso|Tuxyso]] ([[User talk:Tuxyso|talk]]) 13:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:* Hi, this is an ”old” picture (ok, from 2010...) and I think I've learned quite much since then. But when I was in the same place the last year I tested different kind of compositions and places to take the shot. I ended up a similar looking composition because I still felt that a better spot and composition was very difficult to find. In my taste, the left ridge was quite necessary to include because otherwise I wouldn't have liked how the coast was so close to the left edge of the picture. In addition, the left ridge is so high and close that the composition would only get more weird by including the top of that mountain (then the left line wouldn't go out from the top). So in my opinion, this was a good enough compromise but I understand the ''issue'' very well. --[[User:Ximonic|Ximonic]] ([[User talk:Ximonic|talk]]) 14:43, 25 March 2013 (UTC)