16 Mar

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Microtoerisme

r
← Older revision
Revision as of 19:30, 16 March 2013
Line 28:
Line 28:

**As it happens, it is not unrealistic to have a bot do a standard size trim off 1,452 files. Of course, were we to be able to work with this project contributor to reach a common understanding of how best to use the attribution licence, rather than finding ways to punish them, they may well choose to release unwatermarked versions. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 19:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

**As it happens, it is not unrealistic to have a bot do a standard size trim off 1,452 files. Of course, were we to be able to work with this project contributor to reach a common understanding of how best to use the attribution licence, rather than finding ways to punish them, they may well choose to release unwatermarked versions. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 19:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

::*[[User:VanBuren]] has already tried to convince the user to submit pictures without watermark. Microtoerisme's response was: ''"Het plaatsen van foto's zonder watermerk, waar jij mij toe probeert over te halen, is voor mij niet "lonend"'' (''"Upload of pictures without watermark, which you try to persuade me to do, would have no payback for me."''), showing again that his SOLE purpose in uploading these pictures is to draw visitors to his website. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 19:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

::*[[User:VanBuren]] has already tried to convince the user to submit pictures without watermark. Microtoerisme's response was: ''"Het plaatsen van foto's zonder watermerk, waar jij mij toe probeert over te halen, is voor mij niet "lonend"'' (''"Upload of pictures without watermark, which you try to persuade me to do, would have no payback for me."''), showing again that his SOLE purpose in uploading these pictures is to draw visitors to his website. [[User:Whaledad|Whaledad]] ([[User talk:Whaledad|talk]]) 19:17, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

+
:::*Sounds good. I'll quite happily add the website link as a legally required attribution to the 1,400+ images. That's is perfectly well within Commons norms for attribution rather than spam and Microtoerisme might see this as useful reward for their work. As the website provides free downloadable material for the public, this seems like a great win-win. If this uploader still wants to help out with Commons content by making unwatermarked photographs available after the block and criticism, then would be super. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 19:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Microtoerisme&diff=92699633&oldid=92698925