Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Microtoerisme

← Older revision
Revision as of 18:03, 16 March 2013
Line 22:
Line 22:
 
* Btw, most (if not all) of the images this user uploaded have spam messages in Dutch, like these: ''"Deze afbeelding wordt u aangeboden door de Stichting Microtoerisme Inzicht - www.microtoerisme.nl"'' (''"This image is offered to you by the Microtourism Insight Foundation - www.microtoerisme.nl"''), or ''"Op www.microtoerisme.nl kunt u gratis stadswandelingen, audiotours en fietsroutes downloaden. Ook kunt u honderden video's en 10.000+ foto's bekijken. En dagelijks een fotoblog."'' (''"On www.microtoerisme.nl you can download free city walks, audio tours en cycling routes. You can also watch hundreds of videos and 10.000+ photos. And every day a photo blog."''. Regardless the outcome of the watermarks discussion, this clearly spammy messages should imo be removed from all his uploads, which shouldn't be too hard for a bot. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] 01:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
* Btw, most (if not all) of the images this user uploaded have spam messages in Dutch, like these: ''"Deze afbeelding wordt u aangeboden door de Stichting Microtoerisme Inzicht - www.microtoerisme.nl"'' (''"This image is offered to you by the Microtourism Insight Foundation - www.microtoerisme.nl"''), or ''"Op www.microtoerisme.nl kunt u gratis stadswandelingen, audiotours en fietsroutes downloaden. Ook kunt u honderden video's en 10.000+ foto's bekijken. En dagelijks een fotoblog."'' (''"On www.microtoerisme.nl you can download free city walks, audio tours en cycling routes. You can also watch hundreds of videos and 10.000+ photos. And every day a photo blog."''. Regardless the outcome of the watermarks discussion, this clearly spammy messages should imo be removed from all his uploads, which shouldn't be too hard for a bot. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] 01:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*{{vk}} I have requested that this user be unblocked as the one week block does not appear in accordance to the [[Commons:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]]. Uploading watermarked images is not spamming. If these are ear-marked in a suitable category, a batch action can remove the watermarks. The moral rights that this uploader is concerned about are protected by attribution in the CC licence. This should be patiently explained so that the licence clearly includes the attribution they are looking for (at the moment, the examples I find have no proper attribution in the licence). I would be happy to amend the licences by bot, should the attribution statement be agreed, and all the images to be fixed put in one large backlog category. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*{{vk}} I have requested that this user be unblocked as the one week block does not appear in accordance to the [[Commons:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]]. Uploading watermarked images is not spamming. If these are ear-marked in a suitable category, a batch action can remove the watermarks. The moral rights that this uploader is concerned about are protected by attribution in the CC licence. This should be patiently explained so that the licence clearly includes the attribution they are looking for (at the moment, the examples I find have no proper attribution in the licence). I would be happy to amend the licences by bot, should the attribution statement be agreed, and all the images to be fixed put in one large backlog category. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
+
**You don't seem to understand what this case is about. This user is not "concerned about moral rights", and it isn't about attribution. This user is spamming his website. He is spamming on the images, he is spamming in the descriptions of the images, he is spamming in the EXIF information. And even worse, when asked, he said he admitted he is uploading to promote his website, and draw more visitors th his website. He also said he will not stop spamming, and he said he is going to continue spamming, even though he was asked not to. [[User:LeeGer|LeeGer]] ([[User talk:LeeGer|talk]]) 18:03, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*{{vd}} A clear [[COM:ADVERT]] violation. I recommend to delete all uploads from Microtoerisme and permban the useraccount as this is the name of the website. To be clear: I have no problem when Jan Geerling ''under his own name'' creates an account and reuploads his photographs of the Netherlands, but without the '''watermarks''', and without the '''advertising statement on the pages''' and with a '''clean EXIF tag'''. As he has all the originals, he would be the most suitable person to reupload these 1452 images. It is not the job of the community to clean up the mess that Microtoerisme created in the first place. [[User:Hans Erren|Hans Erren]] ([[User talk:Hans Erren|talk]]) 14:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*{{vd}} A clear [[COM:ADVERT]] violation. I recommend to delete all uploads from Microtoerisme and permban the useraccount as this is the name of the website. To be clear: I have no problem when Jan Geerling ''under his own name'' creates an account and reuploads his photographs of the Netherlands, but without the '''watermarks''', and without the '''advertising statement on the pages''' and with a '''clean EXIF tag'''. As he has all the originals, he would be the most suitable person to reupload these 1452 images. It is not the job of the community to clean up the mess that Microtoerisme created in the first place. [[User:Hans Erren|Hans Erren]] ([[User talk:Hans Erren|talk]]) 14:52, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**You are quoting a shortcut (ADVERT) to a sentence within a ''guideline'', that itself entirely relies on an interpretation of a subsection of [[COM:scope|scope]]. The key point of that paragraph in the scope ''official policy'' is that content should realistically be of an educational purpose. All these images fit that description, so there is no tangible rationale for a deletion here. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 16:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**You are quoting a shortcut (ADVERT) to a sentence within a ''guideline'', that itself entirely relies on an interpretation of a subsection of [[COM:scope|scope]]. The key point of that paragraph in the scope ''official policy'' is that content should realistically be of an educational purpose. All these images fit that description, so there is no tangible rationale for a deletion here. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 16:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Microtoerisme&diff=92694607&oldid=92692731