Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Microtoerisme
k
← Older revision
Revision as of 10:16, 16 March 2013
Line 21:
Line 21:
* Btw, most (if not all) of the images this user uploaded have spam messages in Dutch, like these: ''"Deze afbeelding wordt u aangeboden door de Stichting Microtoerisme Inzicht - www.microtoerisme.nl"'' (''"This image is offered to you by the Microtourism Insight Foundation - www.microtoerisme.nl"''), or ''"Op www.microtoerisme.nl kunt u gratis stadswandelingen, audiotours en fietsroutes downloaden. Ook kunt u honderden video's en 10.000+ foto's bekijken. En dagelijks een fotoblog."'' (''"On www.microtoerisme.nl you can download free city walks, audio tours en cycling routes. You can also watch hundreds of videos and 10.000+ photos. And every day a photo blog."''. Regardless the outcome of the watermarks discussion, this clearly spammy messages should imo be removed from all his uploads, which shouldn't be too hard for a bot. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] 01:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
* Btw, most (if not all) of the images this user uploaded have spam messages in Dutch, like these: ''"Deze afbeelding wordt u aangeboden door de Stichting Microtoerisme Inzicht - www.microtoerisme.nl"'' (''"This image is offered to you by the Microtourism Insight Foundation - www.microtoerisme.nl"''), or ''"Op www.microtoerisme.nl kunt u gratis stadswandelingen, audiotours en fietsroutes downloaden. Ook kunt u honderden video's en 10.000+ foto's bekijken. En dagelijks een fotoblog."'' (''"On www.microtoerisme.nl you can download free city walks, audio tours en cycling routes. You can also watch hundreds of videos and 10.000+ photos. And every day a photo blog."''. Regardless the outcome of the watermarks discussion, this clearly spammy messages should imo be removed from all his uploads, which shouldn't be too hard for a bot. [[User:Wutsje|Wutsje]] 01:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
+
*{{vk}} I have requested that this user be unblocked as the one week block does not appear in accordance to the [[Commons:Blocking policy|Blocking policy]]. Uploading watermarked images is not spamming. If these are ear-marked in a suitable category, a batch action can remove the watermarks. The moral rights that this uploader is concerned about are protected by attribution in the CC licence. This should be patiently explained so that the licence clearly includes the attribution they are looking for (at the moment, the examples I find have no proper attribution in the licence). I would be happy to amend the licences by bot, should the attribution statement be agreed, and all the images to be fixed put in one large backlog category. Thanks --[[User:Fæ|Fæ]] ([[User talk:Fæ|talk]]) 10:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)