Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woman in orgasm.jpg

‎File:Woman in orgasm.jpg: supplmentaing
← Older revision
Revision as of 10:03, 24 March 2013
Line 6:
Line 6:
 
*I contest deletion on a point of order: that the model is identifiable. The standard and universal technique for rendering people unidentifiable in images is to obliterate the models' eyes. This model's eyes are closed and the entire face is averted from the camera that the upper part of the face is off-screen. Say I put her next to you, you would be hard pressed to say that she is the person in the image, so the question was moot. And when I said that the model would want to be identified in any way, I implied that I was in no doubt the image did not render her identifiable, otherwise I would not have contributed this image to one of the world's busiest sites; the act of publishing her consent would automatically identify the subject. QED: no COM:PEOPLE violation. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 17:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*I contest deletion on a point of order: that the model is identifiable. The standard and universal technique for rendering people unidentifiable in images is to obliterate the models' eyes. This model's eyes are closed and the entire face is averted from the camera that the upper part of the face is off-screen. Say I put her next to you, you would be hard pressed to say that she is the person in the image, so the question was moot. And when I said that the model would want to be identified in any way, I implied that I was in no doubt the image did not render her identifiable, otherwise I would not have contributed this image to one of the world's busiest sites; the act of publishing her consent would automatically identify the subject. QED: no COM:PEOPLE violation. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 17:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**I'll pretend for a second that this is not a clearly identifiable person depicted in the image. From [[Commons:PEOPLE#Identification]]: "Placing a black band over the eyes was historically used to hide patient identity in medical publications but is no longer considered effective." Also: "Where the law forbids taking or publishing a photograph of a person without consent, '''and consent has not been given''', then making the subject hard to identify (such as blurring their face) is unethical: '''the photograph should not be uploaded to Commons'''." --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 17:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**I'll pretend for a second that this is not a clearly identifiable person depicted in the image. From [[Commons:PEOPLE#Identification]]: "Placing a black band over the eyes was historically used to hide patient identity in medical publications but is no longer considered effective." Also: "Where the law forbids taking or publishing a photograph of a person without consent, '''and consent has not been given''', then making the subject hard to identify (such as blurring their face) is unethical: '''the photograph should not be uploaded to Commons'''." --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 17:40, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
−
**This discussion seems to be hinging on whether the subject is identifiable. We just need an objective determination of that from one of the admins here. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 09:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
+
**Note that I said I thought she would not want to be identified. I never said that she did not consent to this image being published. This discussion seems to be hinging on whether the subject is identifiable. We just need an objective determination of that from one of the admins here. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 09:57, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Woman_in_orgasm.jpg&diff=93186549&oldid=93186359