19 Mar

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Woman in orgasm.jpg

← Older revision
Revision as of 17:36, 19 March 2013
Line 4:
Line 4:

:''*I deliberately chose that image because I did not feel she was "clearly identifiable". Maybe our definitions differ. I'm not sure that I can disclose any more; '''nor that the 'model' would want to be identified in any way'''. Just as a side note, I see that it's been quite a popular choice across all language 'pedias, but delete it if you feel that existing permissions are insufficient. --Ohconfucius (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)''[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ohconfucius&diff=92794006&oldid=92415479] (emphasis mine)

:''*I deliberately chose that image because I did not feel she was "clearly identifiable". Maybe our definitions differ. I'm not sure that I can disclose any more; '''nor that the 'model' would want to be identified in any way'''. Just as a side note, I see that it's been quite a popular choice across all language 'pedias, but delete it if you feel that existing permissions are insufficient. --Ohconfucius (talk) 02:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)''[http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ohconfucius&diff=92794006&oldid=92415479] (emphasis mine)

Ohconfucius' comment implies that the model would not want to be identified, which makes this a clear [[COM:PEOPLE]] violation, since the model is clearly identifiable. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 11:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Ohconfucius' comment implies that the model would not want to be identified, which makes this a clear [[COM:PEOPLE]] violation, since the model is clearly identifiable. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 11:51, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
−
*I contest deletion on a point of order: that the model is identifiable. The standard and universal technique for rendering people unidentifiable in images is to obliterate the models' eyes. This model's eyes are closed and averted from the camera. Say I put her next to you, you would be hard pressed to say that she is the person in the image, so the question was moot. And when I said that the model would want to be identified in any way, I implied that I was in no doubt the image did not render her identifiable; the act of publishing her consent would automatically identify the subject. QED: no COM:PEOPLE violation. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 17:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
+
*I contest deletion on a point of order: that the model is identifiable. The standard and universal technique for rendering people unidentifiable in images is to obliterate the models' eyes. This model's eyes are closed and the entire face is averted from the camera that the upper part of the face is off-screen. Say I put her next to you, you would be hard pressed to say that she is the person in the image, so the question was moot. And when I said that the model would want to be identified in any way, I implied that I was in no doubt the image did not render her identifiable, otherwise I would not have contributed this image to one of the world's busiest sites; the act of publishing her consent would automatically identify the subject. QED: no COM:PEOPLE violation. --[[User:Ohconfucius|Ohconfucius]] ([[User talk:Ohconfucius|talk]]) 17:13, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Woman_in_orgasm.jpg&diff=92882223&oldid=92881587