Commons:Deletion requests/File:Windows 3.1 logo.svg
Keep
← Older revision
Revision as of 06:08, 29 March 2013
Line 5:
Line 5:
This file was listed on English Wikipedia as a Windows 3.0 logo, I have just replaced it there with the real Windows 3.0 logo. If the file can be listed there for years and linked from Windows 3.1. article, why it cannot be listed here under its corrected name? Also, would you please clarify the situation - on one side, we have a fake Windows 1.0 logo at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_logo_and_watermark_-_1985.svg which is being kept despite of all the complaints, and on the other side, this 100% valid logo should be removed??? -- [[User:Aaleksanyants|Aaleksanyants]] ([[User talk:Aaleksanyants|talk]]) 18:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
This file was listed on English Wikipedia as a Windows 3.0 logo, I have just replaced it there with the real Windows 3.0 logo. If the file can be listed there for years and linked from Windows 3.1. article, why it cannot be listed here under its corrected name? Also, would you please clarify the situation - on one side, we have a fake Windows 1.0 logo at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Windows_logo_and_watermark_-_1985.svg which is being kept despite of all the complaints, and on the other side, this 100% valid logo should be removed??? -- [[User:Aaleksanyants|Aaleksanyants]] ([[User talk:Aaleksanyants|talk]]) 18:05, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
:{{vk}} --[[User:Alan.lorenzo|Alan Lorenzo]] ([[User_talk:Alan.lorenzo|talk]]) 14:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
:{{vk}} --[[User:Alan.lorenzo|Alan Lorenzo]] ([[User_talk:Alan.lorenzo|talk]]) 14:04, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:{{vk}} – I have seen a lot of files that do not fall withing the threshold of originality (as well as ''a lot'' of those that are copyright-protected) and per my experience, this file ''is'' eligible for inclusion in Wikimedia Commons under its current license tags. Best regards, [[User:Codename Lisa|Codename Lisa]] ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|talk]]) 06:08, 29 March 2013 (UTC)