Commons:Deletion requests/File:Uudam singing painting.jpg
← Older revision
Revision as of 16:02, 1 April 2013
Line 9:
Line 9:
::Most people know this guy from TV, they would have seen the precise performance I expect. He's not known for anything else as far as I know. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 22:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
::Most people know this guy from TV, they would have seen the precise performance I expect. He's not known for anything else as far as I know. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 22:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
{{vd}} The image is a [[COM:DW|derivative work]]. Even if considered that the derivative work is so different to the original not to be an actual derivative work, we lack permission from both the image this DR deals with and the original image. --[[User:ecemaml|Ecemaml]] [[User_talk:ecemaml|talk to me/habla conmigo]] 12:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
{{vd}} The image is a [[COM:DW|derivative work]]. Even if considered that the derivative work is so different to the original not to be an actual derivative work, we lack permission from both the image this DR deals with and the original image. --[[User:ecemaml|Ecemaml]] [[User_talk:ecemaml|talk to me/habla conmigo]] 12:21, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
−
+
::derivative of what ? the other half of your point is missing. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 16:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
{{vd}} I think this illustration shows Uudam in a way grotesque. I doubt that he the same would like to accept it. And his opinion and his legal guardians (adoptive parents) should be primarily taken into account. But can not ask them, so therefore should be removed it. On the internet there are enough real photos of a good quality.--[[User:Seti6908|Seti6908]] ([[User talk:Seti6908|talk]]) 19:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
{{vd}} I think this illustration shows Uudam in a way grotesque. I doubt that he the same would like to accept it. And his opinion and his legal guardians (adoptive parents) should be primarily taken into account. But can not ask them, so therefore should be removed it. On the internet there are enough real photos of a good quality.--[[User:Seti6908|Seti6908]] ([[User talk:Seti6908|talk]]) 19:52, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:::(inserted comment) I've just changed the res, please consider the new image. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 16:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
::Why can't we ask them exactly ? and while we are at it, let's ask them for a decent photo. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 22:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
::Why can't we ask them exactly ? and while we are at it, let's ask them for a decent photo. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 22:38, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
:::You can write him an e-mail if you know that and if you can break through the [[w:Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China|Chinese Internet censorship]]. I am too small. Even if Uudam has an e-mail, he probably can't answer to USA. Furthermore this image has really very poor quality. In my opinion it is ridiculous, and Uudam is not able to defend himself. If it were otherwise, surely he or someone from his family would be able to load on The Commons truely real picture a hundred times better than this. Of course I would like to, that in the article was a legal photo of Uudam, not violate copyright, but not at any price. Not at the cost of common sense. Sorry, that's my opinion and I will stand by it emphatically insisted.--[[User:Seti6908|Seti6908]] ([[User talk:Seti6908|talk]]) 00:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
:::You can write him an e-mail if you know that and if you can break through the [[w:Internet censorship in the People's Republic of China|Chinese Internet censorship]]. I am too small. Even if Uudam has an e-mail, he probably can't answer to USA. Furthermore this image has really very poor quality. In my opinion it is ridiculous, and Uudam is not able to defend himself. If it were otherwise, surely he or someone from his family would be able to load on The Commons truely real picture a hundred times better than this. Of course I would like to, that in the article was a legal photo of Uudam, not violate copyright, but not at any price. Not at the cost of common sense. Sorry, that's my opinion and I will stand by it emphatically insisted.--[[User:Seti6908|Seti6908]] ([[User talk:Seti6908|talk]]) 00:42, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
Line 16:
Line 17:
::::Of course of course no problem. I think I better give it a try can't be bothered myself. I had seen things like this image which is headed for deletion. There'd be a wide variety of people to ask, however I can't sign in to face book and ask them, so I may need help there. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 06:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
::::Of course of course no problem. I think I better give it a try can't be bothered myself. I had seen things like this image which is headed for deletion. There'd be a wide variety of people to ask, however I can't sign in to face book and ask them, so I may need help there. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 06:32, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
{{vd}} Don't see it being used for anything useful. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 14:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
{{vd}} Don't see it being used for anything useful. --[[User:Conti|Conti]]|[[User talk:Conti|✉]] 14:34, 29 March 2013 (UTC)
+
:It was in the article for some time as far as I recall, I think the main problem was how ugly it is when looked at up close, as is any image, be it oils, watercolour, macaroni :) or pixels on a glass screen. I've reduced the resolution, which always made it look better, so that now people can't get that close-up surprise.
+
:However, I don't know who can 'look again with new eyes' and who will simply have the memory cache stuck in it's usual position. who knows. [[User:Penyulap|'''Penyulap''']][[User talk:Penyulap| ☏]] 16:02, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
/image%2F0119748%2F20140527%2Fob_5bc3f3_alfred-molet-timbre-postal-01.JPG)
/https%3A%2F%2Fassets.over-blog.com%2Ft%2Fcedistic%2Fcamera.png)
/image%2F0119748%2F20140527%2Fob_49a920_alfred-molet-timbre-postal-01.JPG)
/image%2F0119748%2F20140511%2Fob_63b87d_carte-02.jpg)
