15 Mar

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rumbek Sudan cattle camp2.jpg

Undo revision 92586208 by Nicolas Perrault III (talk)
← Older revision
Revision as of 06:35, 15 March 2013
Line 8:
Line 8:

−
*{{vk}} I disagree with just about all of this deletion request. Given the subjects' posing for the picture, the claims about their privacy being invaded are laughable. The stuff about objectification and lack of dignity are a joke: I suppose that ''now'' these people are "civilized" and eat MacDonalds :-( . '''But''' there are ''several'' naked children, some in poses which (in a glamor model) might be considered erotic and kiddy genitals are visible. That's a definite no no for the Commons. Somebody tell Jimbo that we really have found some kiddiporn and it's author is the US government! --[[User:Simonxag|Simonxag]] ([[User talk:Simonxag|talk]]) 21:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
+
*{{vd}} I disagree with just about all of this deletion request. Given the subjects' posing for the picture, the claims about their privacy being invaded are laughable. The stuff about objectification and lack of dignity are a joke: I suppose that ''now'' these people are "civilized" and eat MacDonalds :-( . '''But''' there are ''several'' naked children, some in poses which (in a glamor model) might be considered erotic and kiddy genitals are visible. That's a definite no no for the Commons. Somebody tell Jimbo that we really have found some kiddiporn and it's author is the US government! --[[User:Simonxag|Simonxag]] ([[User talk:Simonxag|talk]]) 21:31, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

*{{neutral}} It being outdated is an invalid argument. This is not an article about the current state of the culture, it is an image with a date in a media repository. If it is incorrectly used in an article, please address this on Wikipedia instead. The file would be usable in for example a historic context about how the culture was when the picture was taken. –''[[User:Krinkle|Krinkle]]''^{[[User talk:Krinkle|talk]]} 03:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

*{{neutral}} It being outdated is an invalid argument. This is not an article about the current state of the culture, it is an image with a date in a media repository. If it is incorrectly used in an article, please address this on Wikipedia instead. The file would be usable in for example a historic context about how the culture was when the picture was taken. –''[[User:Krinkle|Krinkle]]''^{[[User talk:Krinkle|talk]]} 03:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

* {{neutral}} It is not clear to me whether Simonxag above is being sarcastic when he calls this "kiddiporn", but to state the obvious: Of course it is not. Nakedness is not pornographic and there is no erotism whatsoever in this picture. --[[User:Momotaro|Momotaro]] ([[User talk:Momotaro|talk]]) 13:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

* {{neutral}} It is not clear to me whether Simonxag above is being sarcastic when he calls this "kiddiporn", but to state the obvious: Of course it is not. Nakedness is not pornographic and there is no erotism whatsoever in this picture. --[[User:Momotaro|Momotaro]] ([[User talk:Momotaro|talk]]) 13:44, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Rumbek_Sudan_cattle_camp2.jpg&diff=92606482&oldid=92586208