Commons:Deletion requests/File:Redacted hot air balloon festival.jpg
fmt, grammar
← Older revision
Revision as of 11:20, 16 March 2013
Line 24:
Line 24:
:I couldn't find an email for [[w:Stephen Hillenburg]] so I sent one to Viacom to forward to him. He may give us a free licence for the original image which would save us further discussion.--[[User:Canoe1967|Canoe1967]] ([[User talk:Canoe1967|talk]]) 17:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
:I couldn't find an email for [[w:Stephen Hillenburg]] so I sent one to Viacom to forward to him. He may give us a free licence for the original image which would save us further discussion.--[[User:Canoe1967|Canoe1967]] ([[User talk:Canoe1967|talk]]) 17:10, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
::Your logic about who owns the copyright to any given Spongebob image is faulty: just because Viacom claims a trademark on something doesn't mean that they can't also hold a copyright. The link you provide says nothing one way or another about who the copyright holder is. Even if it is Hillenburg, if he didn't design the balloon itself, then he doesn't own the (entire) copyright to it. A 3-D derivative of a 2-D work has novel creative elements that probably cross the threshold of originality. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 11:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
::Your logic about who owns the copyright to any given Spongebob image is faulty: just because Viacom claims a trademark on something doesn't mean that they can't also hold a copyright. The link you provide says nothing one way or another about who the copyright holder is. Even if it is Hillenburg, if he didn't design the balloon itself, then he doesn't own the (entire) copyright to it. A 3-D derivative of a 2-D work has novel creative elements that probably cross the threshold of originality. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 11:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
−
:{{vd}} absent identification of all relevant copyright holders and confirmation that they've freely licensed their respective works. If this image is a derivative of non-free media, then the fact that it's a legitimate parody or satire on censorship is irrelevant; we don't host fair-use material on Commons. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 11:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)
+
{{vd}} all absent identification of all relevant copyright holders and confirmation that they've freely licensed their respective works. If these images are derivatives of non-free media, then the fact that they're legitimate parodies or satires on censorship is irrelevant; we don't host fair-use material on Commons. —[[User:Psychonaut|Psychonaut]] ([[User talk:Psychonaut|talk]]) 11:19, 16 March 2013 (UTC)