Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logo Veluwelijn.png
File:Logo Veluwelijn.png: speedily deleted and closed
← Older revision
Revision as of 13:12, 22 March 2013
Line 12:
Line 12:
'''Deleted''': This appears to be the logo of a bus line, see [[:nl:Veluwelijn (buslijn)]]. Even if this bus line is owned by the public, I do not see how {{tl|PD-NL-Gov}} applies here. There remains the question whether this logo falls under the [[COM:TOO|threshold of originality]]. This could be very well the case given its simplicity. But unfortunately, we have currently no information about Dutch case law in this regard at Commons such that it seems best to delete it for now. --[[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 13:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
'''Deleted''': This appears to be the logo of a bus line, see [[:nl:Veluwelijn (buslijn)]]. Even if this bus line is owned by the public, I do not see how {{tl|PD-NL-Gov}} applies here. There remains the question whether this logo falls under the [[COM:TOO|threshold of originality]]. This could be very well the case given its simplicity. But unfortunately, we have currently no information about Dutch case law in this regard at Commons such that it seems best to delete it for now. --[[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 13:25, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
{{delf}}
{{delf}}
+
{{delh}}
=== [[:File:Logo Veluwelijn.png]] ===
=== [[:File:Logo Veluwelijn.png]] ===
Possible copyvio. It has not been ascertained that this is indeed a government publication, see also previous deletion request(s). [[User:Pbech|Pbech]] ([[User talk:Pbech|talk]]) 10:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. It has not been ascertained that this is indeed a government publication, see also previous deletion request(s). [[User:Pbech|Pbech]] ([[User talk:Pbech|talk]]) 10:58, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
+
----
+
I have '''speedily deleted''' this as this is just a new upload of an already deleted image. To my knowledge, no request for restoration has been put at [[COM:UDEL]], no other community discussion has taken place, and nothing has been presented that puts the previous conclusion into doubt. If this is to be challanged, this has to go to [[COM:UDEL]]. --[[User:AFBorchert|AFBorchert]] ([[User talk:AFBorchert|talk]]) 13:12, 22 March 2013 (UTC)
+
{{delf}}