Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karta2.PNG

← Older revision
Revision as of 14:29, 15 March 2013
Line 10:
Line 10:
 
* '''Keep''', this is topographic map + facts. [[User:Serebr|Serebr]] ([[User talk:Serebr|talk]]) 13:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 
* '''Keep''', this is topographic map + facts. [[User:Serebr|Serebr]] ([[User talk:Serebr|talk]]) 13:28, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 
** Expression of facts are copyrightable.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 23:20, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 
** Expression of facts are copyrightable.--[[User:Prosfilaes|Prosfilaes]] ([[User talk:Prosfilaes|talk]]) 23:20, 13 March 2013 (UTC)
 
+
*** In this case why? [[User:Serebr|Serebr]] ([[User talk:Serebr|talk]]) 14:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Speedy delete''' - the uploader has a misunderstanding of [[Commons:Derivative_works#Maps]]. Only those elements that involve no creativity are public domain. In [https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/967/967.F2d.135.91-2305.html Mason v Montgomery Data et al 1992], the court found that there was creativity involved in " each mapmaker's selection of sources, interpretation of those sources, discretion in reconciling inconsistencies among the sources, and skill and judgment in depicting the information." The ruling in that case describes a similar circumstance to this map: "But the evidence in this case demonstrates that Mason exercised sufficient creativity when he created his maps. In his deposition and affidavit, Mason explained the choices that he independently made to select information from numerous and sometimes conflicting sources, and to depict that information on his maps.10 Mason's compilation of the information on his maps involved creativity that far exceeds the required minimum level." In other words, if the map is just an outline of the state of Texas and some dots for cities, it's ineligible for protection. But if the author puts skill into selecting elements to include on the map, then it's copyrighted. --[[User:UserB|UserB]] ([[User talk:UserB|talk]]) 13:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
*'''Speedy delete''' - the uploader has a misunderstanding of [[Commons:Derivative_works#Maps]]. Only those elements that involve no creativity are public domain. In [https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F2/967/967.F2d.135.91-2305.html Mason v Montgomery Data et al 1992], the court found that there was creativity involved in " each mapmaker's selection of sources, interpretation of those sources, discretion in reconciling inconsistencies among the sources, and skill and judgment in depicting the information." The ruling in that case describes a similar circumstance to this map: "But the evidence in this case demonstrates that Mason exercised sufficient creativity when he created his maps. In his deposition and affidavit, Mason explained the choices that he independently made to select information from numerous and sometimes conflicting sources, and to depict that information on his maps.10 Mason's compilation of the information on his maps involved creativity that far exceeds the required minimum level." In other words, if the map is just an outline of the state of Texas and some dots for cities, it's ineligible for protection. But if the author puts skill into selecting elements to include on the map, then it's copyrighted. --[[User:UserB|UserB]] ([[User talk:UserB|talk]]) 13:11, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**In the rule Wikimedia this aspect (nuance) '''NO''', although they are very careful (attentive) to the author law (law of copyright protection). [[User:Strannik27|Strannik27]] ([[User talk:Strannik27|talk]]) 13:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
 
**In the rule Wikimedia this aspect (nuance) '''NO''', although they are very careful (attentive) to the author law (law of copyright protection). [[User:Strannik27|Strannik27]] ([[User talk:Strannik27|talk]]) 13:38, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Karta2.PNG&diff=92623797&oldid=92621810