Commons:Deletion requests/File:First Upper Canada Parliament, destroyed in the war of 1812.gif
File:First Upper Canada Parliament, destroyed in the war of 1812.gif: del
← Older revision
Revision as of 11:00, 26 March 2013
Line 21:
Line 21:
*'''Call for closure''' please. Nominator has agreed to keep the image, and I changed the three instances where it was used on en.wiki to use one of the newer, superior images. [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 20:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
*'''Call for closure''' please. Nominator has agreed to keep the image, and I changed the three instances where it was used on en.wiki to use one of the newer, superior images. [[User:Geo Swan|Geo Swan]] ([[User talk:Geo Swan|talk]]) 20:29, 21 March 2013 (UTC)
::Close for a keep (because you would like to keep the image) or close for a delete (because you've removed the impediment to deleting it due to COM:SCOPE)? I think at this point we'll simply defer to your wishes, Geo. --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 17:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
::Close for a keep (because you would like to keep the image) or close for a delete (because you've removed the impediment to deleting it due to COM:SCOPE)? I think at this point we'll simply defer to your wishes, Geo. --[[User:Skeezix1000|Skeezix1000]] ([[User talk:Skeezix1000|talk]]) 17:18, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
+
+
*{{vd}} Rather than simply close this as a '''delete''', in deference to George's passion for this image, I'll add my two cents. As far as I can tell, the two images are scans of the same drawing. If you change the mode of the larger image to B&W and resample it down by a factor of four to the same size as the subject, you are left with an image that is virtually identical to the subject image. The differences noted above are simply sampling artifacts. The scale of the drawing is approximately 2.5 inches per pixel, so that the missing cane would be less than half a pixel wide and therefore does not appear. The people on the walk between the buildings are there in the subject image, but not recognizable as people -- their torsos are only ten pixels wide in the larger image so that when you cut that by a factor of four, you have only two or three pixels left. A person two pixels wide doesn't look very much like a human. I see no reason to keep a much inferior copy of the same original. . Jim . . . . [[User:Jameslwoodward|(Jameslwoodward)]] ([[User talk:Jameslwoodward|talk to me]]) 11:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)