Commons:Deletion requests/File:Check used in Internet scam with victims name removed.JPG
← Older revision
Revision as of 17:30, 15 March 2013
Line 4:
Line 4:
Another possibility: I could upload a second image, but with the name in the signature box wiped out -- would this be an agreeable compromise? or are there other issues and what are they?--[[User:Tomwsulcer|Tomwsulcer]] ([[User talk:Tomwsulcer|talk]]) 16:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Another possibility: I could upload a second image, but with the name in the signature box wiped out -- would this be an agreeable compromise? or are there other issues and what are they?--[[User:Tomwsulcer|Tomwsulcer]] ([[User talk:Tomwsulcer|talk]]) 16:23, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
−
*{{vk}} I'm not seeing where the alleged copyright violation is. I don't believe business forms of this prosaic nature can be copyrighted. There no Citobank logo, just their lettering, and we know that that is not copyrightable. I don't see where there is a copyright issue at all. There '''''might''''' have been a privacy issue if the check had been legitimate, but as the result of fraudulent activity, I don't believe privacy is a concern. I would like the nominator to be specific about what the perceived problem with this image is. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 17:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
+
*{{vk}} I'm not seeing where the alleged copyright violation is. I don't believe business forms of this prosaic nature can be copyrighted. There no Citobank logo, just their lettering, and we know that that is not copyrightable. I don't see where there is a copyright issue at all. There '''''might''''' have been a privacy issue if the check had been legitimate, but as the result of fraudulent activity, I don't believe privacy is a concern. I would like the nominator, User:McGeddon, to be specific about what the perceived problem with this image is. [[User:Beyond My Ken|Beyond My Ken]] ([[User talk:Beyond My Ken|talk]]) 17:29, 15 March 2013 (UTC)